A Gambling System That Works

[Yo_Respek]

I've developed a way to beat any gambling game that has a 1 percent disadvantage or less. I don't care about making any money from the idea my real purpose is to help people win.

I would like to use this forum to get people to test the idea in any bacarat or blackjack game that has a 1 percent disadvantage or less. If testing for bacarat only play the player bet for simplicity. If playing blackjack only play a 6,8,or perpetual shoe game.

The System

A betting system can beat bacarat. The way to overcome the 1 percent disadvantage is to always bet more when you win. You only have three results possible. Banker,Player,Tie. The tie is a push so it isn't a win or a loss.

By structuring your bets to the overall eventual result you prepare for that result that will eventually occur. Over a certain number of game results the overall odds of the game will eventually come out.

If I bet 1 unit and lose I know that is not a win. Since I know that wins must occur eventually I gradually bet more anticipating a win. My goal is to increase and decrease my bets to "mark" wins and losses. I decrease them gradually by 1 unit up and down. If I win I decrease by one unit and if I lose I increase by one unit.

The maximum amount of increases is 48. At that point each bet I make becomes unprofitable.

Over time it should take 100 results for the player bet to occur one less time than the banker bet(actually the odds are better but for simplicity sake I make it worse).

It should take 4800 instances for the player bet to occur 48 times less frequently than the banker bet.

If in fact it takes 4800 hundred hands for the player bet to occur the results will look like this

2420 loses
2380 wins

In this example you would be up 1540 units.

Test it out and post your results. Remember start at one unit and stop at 48 units. Increasing or decreasing by one unit as you win and lose. A win is a decrease of 1 unit and a loss is a increase of one unit. If you are at the starting point and winning keep betting that amount.

I won 8400 on Party Poker doing this.

[Skipbidder]

Strong work.
I really thought you were serious in the other threads rather than trolling. You got me.

[Yo_Respek]

[ QUOTE ]
Strong work.
I really thought you were serious in the other threads rather than trolling. You got me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand what you mean. I don't know what trolling is. Could you explain what you mean so I understand.

[AlienBoy]

This systems has been around almost as long as Martingale.

One variant is known as "reverse Labouchere" and another variant as "reverse martingale".

Regardless, it is still nothing but VOODOO MATH, and an incredible tax on the statistically ignorant.



http://wizardofodds.com/gambling/bettingsystems.html



AB

[Yo_Respek]

I do not see this system there. I included the disadvantage in the math. If I always have a higher bet when I win and a lower bet when I lose that will overcome the house advantage.

[Yo_Respek]

[ QUOTE ]
This systems has been around almost as long as Martingale.

One variant is known as "reverse Labouchere" and another variant as "reverse martingale".

Regardless, it is still nothing but VOODOO MATH, and an incredible tax on the statistically ignorant.



http://wizardofodds.com/gambling/bettingsystems.html



AB

[/ QUOTE ]

I am not basing it on previous results I am basing it on initial odds.

Answer this question. If I have a 1 percent disadvantage on the player bet. How many results on average would I have to play before there were 50 more banker results than player results?

[Yo_Respek]

The disadvantage in bacarat is calculated on flat betting. If I bet 100 dollars 100 times I lose 1 dollar for every bet I make if I have a disadvantage. This is based on losing the player bet 1 extra time.

[ojc02]

[ QUOTE ]
I do not see this system there. I included the disadvantage in the math. If I always have a higher bet when I win and a lower bet when I lose that will overcome the house advantage.

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously, do yourself a favor and stop gambling until you obtain some vague mathematical ability. I'm really not trying to be mean, but it's for your own good.

Do you know what an independent event is?

The game has no memory of the fact that you just won or lost. EVERY bet you place is -ve expected value. There is NO system that can win. I don't need to do a simulation because I know the answer, your expected ending balance will be 99% of the total amount of money you bet.

[AlienBoy]

[ QUOTE ]
Seriously, do yourself a favor and stop gambling until you obtain some vague mathematical ability.

[/ QUOTE ]


LOLZ


You can lead a whore to knowledge but you can't make her think.

Let me repeat by shouting:


THERE IS NO SYSTEM OF WAGERING FOR ANY CASINO GAME THAT BEATS THE HOUSE ADVANTAGE WITHOUT SOME FORM OF ADVANTAGE PLAY, PERIOD.



An advantage play is defined as:

In Blackjack: Counting (and possibly shuffle tracking and depth charging).

In Roulette: Bias tracking, or computer result estimation based on the ballistics of the ball/wheel combination (the latter is illegal).

In Craps: Dice influencing by a skilled dice mechanic (legal methods do exist here).

In Baccarat: Like BJ, counting. however, counting Baccarat isso abysmilly inefficient as to be practically worthless as an advantage play.

Some interesting notes pm baccarat counting:

http://www.bjrnet.com/member/voodoo_...x.cgi?read=663



AB

[Terry]

Why 48? Please explain so I can understand.