|
|
#51
12-11-2006, 07:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Getting staked at Stars 50/100, 100/200 and 200/400....who to avoi
[ QUOTE ]
Bob, good luck man see you at the tables. [/ QUOTE ] you will not see me. i dont play with men who wear bracelets. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] 
|
|
#52
12-11-2006, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Getting staked at Stars 50/100, 100/200 and 200/400....who to avoi
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Bob, good luck man see you on my right. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] promise? EDIT: if you think i wont get you carded, think again.
|
|
#56
12-11-2006, 07:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Getting staked at Stars 50/100, 100/200 and 200/400....who to avoi
[ QUOTE ]
Some, I don't understand the point of giving Bob a hard time about his decision. Why should anyone be critical of another's decision as to how they want to go about whatever they want to do in poker? It just doesn't make sense. Bob, good luck man see you at the tables. [/ QUOTE ] IanJ -- I routinely make non-profit-maximizing decisions in game selection (and, unfortunately, during game-play). Whether or not PB plays big on Stars means nothing to me. My posts were motivated by a combination of bewilderment that PB would choose to make his game-selection thread one about the *best* regulars, and -- to be honest -- probably some residual annoyance at PB's general posting style. PB -- good luck. Post hands. I'll be curious. --Nate
|
|
#57
12-11-2006, 08:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Getting staked at Stars 50/100, 100/200 and 200/400....who to avoi
PB, why stars and not full tilt, just curious.
|
|
#60
12-12-2006, 01:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Getting staked at Stars 50/100, 100/200 and 200/400....who to avoi
I cant imagine this ending well.
Well, not for the OP or his staker anyways. For a lot of the posters who're encouraging him - seems like it'll end pretty damned well.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
