![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
will you also list which players have what winrates at what levels, etc?
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I think that this is the most interesting data for every buy in. The question should be how to weight different "sample sizes" coming from different players. [/ QUOTE ] I dont know. Anyone? [ QUOTE ] will you also list which players have what winrates at what levels, etc? [/ QUOTE ] No. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
For every player in the database, check to see which of the buyins he has more than 100 games for. For each buyin, determine the winrate and increment a variable that corresponds to that buyin/winrate. [/ QUOTE ] Of how many players do you have 100+ gamesamples at different levels? 900K games will not generate a great number of these I think. Goldmund |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] For every player in the database, check to see which of the buyins he has more than 100 games for. For each buyin, determine the winrate and increment a variable that corresponds to that buyin/winrate. [/ QUOTE ] Of how many players do you have 100+ gamesamples at different levels? 900K games will not generate a great number of these I think. Goldmund [/ QUOTE ] I have no idea. A few hundred, maybe. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] For every player in the database, check to see which of the buyins he has more than 100 games for. For each buyin, determine the winrate and increment a variable that corresponds to that buyin/winrate. [/ QUOTE ] Of how many players do you have 100+ gamesamples at different levels? 900K games will not generate a great number of these I think. Goldmund [/ QUOTE ] I have no idea. A few hundred, maybe. [/ QUOTE ] What % of the players in your database are regulars, and what % of games played have a regular playing? oh and how much better are regulars, and what times/days of the week have more regulars? |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stars does not allow data mining, but if somehow all this information is from stars, I may be interested in purchasing it. Either way, thanks for doing it and I look forward to the results
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Stars does not allow data mining [/ QUOTE ] They dont allow you to datamine hands. I datamined results for HUSNGs, which, like SharkScope, is allowed at the moment. PM me. Nichomacheo |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
New suggestion: a comparison of winrates of a set of players in the Regs v. the Turbo's. To clarify: compare the winrate of winning players ABC etc in the reg's with that in te Turbo's. This might shed some light on the regs/turbo's-issue. Goldmund
|
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Like I said, I dont have much data from the Turbos because they are relatively new and I havent datamined the results in over 6 weeks.
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Want to know what time of day the most fish play? [/ QUOTE ] Yes please? |
![]() |
|
|