|
|
#11
11-25-2006, 03:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Optimal VPIP
[ QUOTE ]
22.36/12.49/2.41 at full tilt [/ QUOTE ] You're horribly, egregiously tight. Anything greater than 23.7 +- .56 is spewy, and any less (including you), is UNBELIEVABLY nitty. 
|
|
#13
11-25-2006, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Optimal VPIP
[ QUOTE ]
Why do I bother asking? I actually can't even tell who's sincere. [/ QUOTE ] Welcome to the forum.
|
|
#15
11-25-2006, 07:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Optimal VPIP
[ QUOTE ]
Why do I bother asking? I actually can't even tell who's sincere. [/ QUOTE ] It's because ther isn't really an answer to your question. Simply playing and raising the agreed "correct" precentage of hands will not make you a winning player. Most people would agree that under 20% is too tight and over 30% is too loose for 6-max(although there will always be exceptions). Anything between that and your postflop play will determine if you're a winner or not.
|
|
#16
11-25-2006, 08:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Optimal VPIP
Thank you, Dagger. I understand what you're saying about postflop. I just started playing shorthanded after playing and winning full ring for two years, and I'm not used to losing. I know I had to loosen up to play shorthanded, but I just wanted to know if I was playing way too tight. It seems all the winners I've been playing with are LAGs.
|
|
#17
11-25-2006, 10:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Optimal VPIP
[ QUOTE ]
Simply playing and raising the agreed "correct" precentage of hands will not make you a winning player. Most people would agree that under 20% is too tight and over 30% is too loose for 6-max(although there will always be exceptions). Anything between that and your postflop play will determine if you're a winner or not. [/ QUOTE ] Well said
|
|
#20
11-25-2006, 10:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Optimal VPIP
50 vp / 40 pfr
Went on to do over 90k hands at very good winrate. Player since moved up to very high limits on Party before the U.S players got banned.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
