![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is dumber? | |||
| The old lady |
|
4 | 36.36% |
| The crook |
|
2 | 18.18% |
| They are both equally unintelligent |
|
5 | 45.45% |
| this space intentionally left blank |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter,
[ QUOTE ] An argument for "game of open information" isn't enough, cause vast amount of simulations can cause this lack of info close to "completely enough" i believe. If so - online and live poker will be dead, cause once it's real online - more people will (as already do for some house games) will bring miniaturized devices with them. [/ QUOTE ] Although I agree that bots are a huge threat to destroying online poker, I do not think I would say the same for live poker. I think stopping the miniaturized devices would not be too difficult, although I could have the wrong impression about how they work. In any case, the end of online poker would have a huge effect on live poker. [ QUOTE ] But i also understand that we cannot defend against bots-infesting online and live. This is a law of progress i guess. AI can make a lot of things better than a human today and will make a lot morethings better than a human tomorrow. We can only make this progress slower like oil companies force invention of new kinds of fuel to stay as slow as possible. [/ QUOTE ] Although I am more pessimistic than most, I am not yet convinced that this is inevitable. Does anybody with programming experience have a comment on this? |
|
|