![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Uh oh this is big time. I have been wrong for every superbowl since I was in 8th grade. I am going for the steelers. One our streaks with end. [/ QUOTE ] umm, after the seahawks win, both our streaks are still intact, no? [/ QUOTE ] That would pretty solidly break your streak. While on the subject of streaks, I grew up a 49er fan (mom's from that area) and have gotten sucked into the Steelers since moving here for grad school 3 years ago. I've got a 5-0 record when cheering for one team in the big game. My record isn't quite as stellar in the conference championships, however. I'm going to predict Seattle 14 - 24 Pittsburgh. Your Super Bowl MVP - Jerome Bettis (though Roethlisberger will probably deserve it). Here are what I think(hope?) will be the keys to the game: 1. coaching - Holmgren is good, but Cowher et al have clearly outcoached their opponents in all three games, in particular the last two. 2. Pittsburgh's ability to run - we haven't been able to run in the playoffs, this actually started dropping off after the Chicago game. Not sure what's going on, hopefully it will come back for the SB. The Steelers have shown that they can win without it but if they get the running game going and have the strong passing game of late it will be very difficult for Seattle to stop them. 3. Seattle's ability to run. Pittsburgh's only had 1 100 yard rusher against them all season. From what I've seen, Hasselbeck reminds me of Roethlisberger last season (albeit with less hair), solid quarterback doesn't make too many mistakes but not really the guy whose shoulders you want to put everything on. Alexander has had a great season so it should be a good matchup. 4. Seattle handling the blitz. Pittsburgh destroyed Indy with it and it was successful against Denver as well. If Seattle can't handle it, especially if their runnning game isn't working well, it will be very difficult to score. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Uh oh this is big time. I have been wrong for every superbowl since I was in 8th grade. I am going for the steelers. One our streaks with end. [/ QUOTE ] umm, after the seahawks win, both our streaks are still intact, no? [/ QUOTE ] That would pretty solidly break your streak. [/ QUOTE ] i guess im retarted, how does seattle winning break either streak? |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Uh oh this is big time. I have been wrong for every superbowl since I was in 8th grade. I am going for the steelers. One our streaks with end. [/ QUOTE ] umm, after the seahawks win, both our streaks are still intact, no? [/ QUOTE ] That would pretty solidly break your streak. [/ QUOTE ] i guess im retarted, how does seattle winning break either streak? [/ QUOTE ] Not sure if you're serious but in case you are, I think we're referring (at least I am) to the "How many points will Denver win by" poll and subsequent loss by the Broncos. Seattle winning would make your guarantee be fulfilled and thus your streak would be broken. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Uh oh this is big time. I have been wrong for every superbowl since I was in 8th grade. I am going for the steelers. One our streaks with end. [/ QUOTE ] umm, after the seahawks win, both our streaks are still intact, no? [/ QUOTE ] That would pretty solidly break your streak. [/ QUOTE ] i guess im retarted, how does seattle winning break either streak? [/ QUOTE ] Not sure if you're serious but in case you are, I think we're referring (at least I am) to the "How many points will Denver win by" poll and subsequent loss by the Broncos. Seattle winning would make your guarantee be fulfilled and thus your streak would be broken. [/ QUOTE ] oh,that. i didnt count that. that was only a practice poll. im never wrong. this poll is for real. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Uh oh this is big time. I have been wrong for every superbowl since I was in 8th grade. I am going for the steelers. One our streaks with end. [/ QUOTE ] umm, after the seahawks win, both our streaks are still intact, no? [/ QUOTE ] That would pretty solidly break your streak. [/ QUOTE ] i guess im retarted, how does seattle winning break either streak? [/ QUOTE ] Not sure if you're serious but in case you are, I think we're referring (at least I am) to the "How many points will Denver win by" poll and subsequent loss by the Broncos. Seattle winning would make your guarantee be fulfilled and thus your streak would be broken. [/ QUOTE ] Why would a man predicting the future worry himself with the past? |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
2. Pittsburgh's ability to run - we haven't been able to run in the playoffs, this actually started dropping off after the Chicago game. Not sure what's going on, hopefully it will come back for the SB. The Steelers have shown that they can win without it but if they get the running game going and have the strong passing game of late it will be very difficult for Seattle to stop them. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, the Seahawks have the best front 7 in all of football. This is going to be a very close game, and it'll probably be soemthing like 28-24, or 35-31. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, the Seahawks have the best front 7 in all of football. [/ QUOTE ] They can be one of the best front 7, but they are very undersized. Where was Indy's front 7? Same type deal... great speed but undersized. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Sorry, the Seahawks have the best front 7 in all of football. [/ QUOTE ] They can be one of the best front 7, but they are very undersized. Where was Indy's front 7? Same type deal... great speed but undersized. [/ QUOTE ] Indy's problem was Manning audibling til 1 second every play making it too easy for Polamalu et al to get a great jump on the snap. Also to the original op, pretty clearly SEA by 10. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Sorry, the Seahawks have the best front 7 in all of football. [/ QUOTE ] They can be one of the best front 7, but they are very undersized. Where was Indy's front 7? Same type deal... great speed but undersized. [/ QUOTE ] Indy's problem was Manning audibling til 1 second every play making it too easy for Polamalu et al to get a great jump on the snap. [/ QUOTE ] We're talking defense here big guy. |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
![]() |
|
|