![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is dumber? | |||
| The old lady |
|
4 | 36.36% |
| The crook |
|
2 | 18.18% |
| They are both equally unintelligent |
|
5 | 45.45% |
| this space intentionally left blank |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
You see!
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
You see! [/ QUOTE ] Using big words to confuse me isn't cool. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[quote This would be much harder for a bot to ever pass by itself and would always require the programmers attention. Example: "Car 1 is red, car 2 is blue. What color is car 1?" I think that is more diffucult to program (reading and interpreting sentences) but would not take any longer for the normal user than trying to decifer characters. [/ QUOTE ] Thats a great idea, I'm tired of playing against foreigners on party. [/ QUOTE ] The easiest thing to do is show a picture of something and give options as to what it is. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
The easiest thing to do is show a picture of something and give options as to what it is. [/ QUOTE ] I think it would be easier to have an easily defeated measure to make people feel safe. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would not say I was using big words.
/Uncool |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spend more time on beating them! Anyone know of any exposable flaws?
|
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
Flint, I'm not 100% about this because I've only seen it a few times but they seem to bet A high on raggy boards when checked to.
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Flint, I'm not 100% about this because I've only seen it a few times but they seem to bet A high on raggy boards when checked to. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
"What caught my attention in the first place was that these players always delay a few seconds before they act pre- and post-flop, except when they have an easy fold decision pre-flop. An obvious example which come up rather frequently: Pre-flop. Player A raises, Bot 3-bets and Player B caps. Player A calls, Bot thinks for a few seconds before it calls the cap. This is an obvious call for pretty much all poker players, but these "bots" _always_ thinks for a few seconds in these spots. Strange me thinks."
A good programmer would never have a timing tell in his play. This would be his first concern to avoid detection. I read bot threads on here 5 or 6 years ago and the consensus (led by the omniscient David Sklansky) was that it was highly unlikely a successfull bot could be written for anything but Heads up play(and possibly Omaha hi low at the lower limits). What has occurred since then to change opinions on this? Has Sklansky changed his stance on this issue? |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Flint, I'm not 100% about this because I've only seen it a few times but they seem to bet A high on raggy boards when checked to. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Am I missing something here? |
![]() |
|
|