Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2006, 04:33 AM
kyleb kyleb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the death of baseball
Posts: 10,765
Default Barfield to the Indians...

...for "third baseman" Kouzmanoff and RHP Andrew Brown.

...

...

hahahah Kevin Towers is an idiot
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-09-2006, 04:40 AM
THAY3R THAY3R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Great White Hope
Posts: 9,755
Default Re: Barfield to the Indians...

[ QUOTE ]
...for "third baseman" Kouzmanoff and RHP Andrew Brown.

...

...

hahahah Kevin Towers is an idiot

[/ QUOTE ]

You really think this was a bad trade for SD?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-09-2006, 04:53 AM
TheRover TheRover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,910
Default Re: Barfield to the Indians...

I don't see how this could be laughable for either side, but then again I am a huge mark for Kouz.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2006, 05:01 AM
TheRover TheRover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,910
Default Re: Barfield to the Indians...

Barfield looks like the epitome of average, but since he's young and very cheap that's pretty cool, I know, but Kouz's defense doesn't seem that terrible, below average, but acceptable and the [censored] can hit like crazy. Plus Clev. threw in a nice reliever and both players going to SD will make the league min. as well as Barfield so what's the BFD? SD seemed set on upgrading at 2B if the rumors are true anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2006, 05:04 AM
rwperu34 rwperu34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,955
Default Re: Barfield to the Indians...

I hear that Marcus Giles might be on his way to SD.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2006, 08:44 AM
Sluss Sluss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back2Back MVP
Posts: 2,304
Default Re: Barfield to the Indians...

[ QUOTE ]
I hear that Marcus Giles might be on his way to SD.

[/ QUOTE ]That's an upgrade?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2006, 10:19 AM
mosdef mosdef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,414
Default Re: Barfield to the Indians...

Ingoring salaries...

They were similar players in 2006, with Giles posting a Win Shares of 16 vs. Barfield's 18. (By comparison, Pujols usually posts a WS of about 40)

But Barfields's younger. However, Giles posted a significantly better 25 WS in 2005, so SD could be praying for a bounce-back to those levels.

Barfield's age probably makes him a better player now, though, since he is more likely to see improvements in performance.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2006, 11:30 AM
J.R. J.R. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,406
Default Re: Barfield to the Indians...

[ QUOTE ]
Ingoring salaries...

They were similar players in 2006, with Giles posting a Win Shares of 16 vs. Barfield's 18. (By comparison, Pujols usually posts a WS of about 40)

But Barfields's younger. However, Giles posted a significantly better 25 WS in 2005, so SD could be praying for a bounce-back to those levels.

Barfield's age probably makes him a better player now, though, since he is more likely to see improvements in performance.

[/ QUOTE ]

Win Shares measures contribution, not true talent. If a player has a high average w/ RISP, then Win Shares gives him credit for that, even if hitting for a high average with RISP is not likely to be a consistently repeatable skill. If a player hits home runs with runners on base, WS gives credit for that, even if there is no repeatable skill in hitting HRs with runners on base v. no runners on base.

Who is a better offensive 3rd baseman - Troy Glaus or Melvin Mora? WS says Mora in 2006, even though Glaus' .252/.355/.513 dwarfs Mora's .274/.342/.391? Why? Largely because Mora hit .306 w/ RISP, Glaus .252.

Using WS is analagous to using RBI- its value lies in its ability to tell us what someone did, but not so much in what someone will do.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-09-2006, 11:48 AM
mosdef mosdef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,414
Default Re: Barfield to the Indians...

Yeah, but it's a good way to quickly look at a player's overall contributions (including defense). Like all baseball stats, it doesn't stand alone.

And in this context, it let's us see why SD may go after Giles (i.e. irrationally praying for a return to 2005's contribution level).

I didn't mean to say "oh, his win shares were higher, he's better". I said "last year they achieved about the same" which is true.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2006, 03:13 PM
J.R. J.R. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,406
Default Re: Barfield to the Indians...

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, but it's a good way to quickly look at a player's overall contributions (including defense). Like all baseball stats, it doesn't stand alone.

And in this context, it let's us see why SD may go after Giles (i.e. irrationally praying for a return to 2005's contribution level).

I didn't mean to say "oh, his win shares were higher, he's better". I said "last year they achieved about the same" which is true.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course the win share numbers you posted are accurate and Giles and Barfield had similar 2006 WS numbers.

WS is largely irrelvant to a meaningful analyasis of issue at hand, which is skill going forward, since WS's value is largely tied up in things that aren't consistently repeatable skills.

FWIW WS feilding stat's aren't very good. They are esentially the same as BP's rate, which means taking traditional fiedlding stats and then adjusting them based on the handeness and gb/fb ratio of a team's staff, plus a few other goodies. PBP defensive stats are far more accurate and meaningful. Article on this issue
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.