![]() |
|
#161
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kyl is up by 13 points in the latest poll. If you don't beleive me check realclearpolitics.com Don't waste your money on this. heck if you want to, fine by me. But we need our own PAC, not just some crazy knee jerk vote for Democrats. As i have said many times, and still stand by it, Democratic operatives are using this site for partisan reasons completely unrelated to online poker. But again, you want to piss your money away against Kyl, fine with me. I think Kyl sucks ass, but he will win.
|
|
#162
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
not just some crazy knee jerk vote for Democrats [/ QUOTE ] Knee jerk? Kyl has been leading the charge against internet gambling since last decade. http://www.techlawjournal.com/internet/80724.htm http://www.techlawjournal.com/internet/19990330gam.htm |
|
#163
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Kyl is up by 13 points in the latest poll. If you don't beleive me check realclearpolitics.com Don't waste your money on this. heck if you want to, fine by me. But we need our own PAC, not just some crazy knee jerk vote for Democrats. As i have said many times, and still stand by it, Democratic operatives are using this site for partisan reasons completely unrelated to online poker. But again, you want to piss your money away against Kyl, fine with me. I think Kyl sucks ass, but he will win. [/ QUOTE ] Poker Players Against Kyl is our own PAC. I don't know what you mean by "democratic operatives," but for reasons that have been stated over and over again a Democratically controlled Congress would be very good for poker. |
|
#164
|
|||
|
|||
|
doesn't matter. where in the Democratic platform does it say they will repeal the ban? Poker is about logic, not emotion, yes the Republicans screwed us, particularly Kyle, Goodlatte, and Frist. Yet, why is voting for a Dem going to fix things? Please tell me.
the fact of the matter is we need a poker player PAC, we need to make our point clearly and singularly. If you think some Dem is going to vote for poker becuase a Repub was against it, you are not being logical. |
|
#165
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't know if you are just trying to rile us up or being serious.
This is just Kyl's first step. He is going to try to win in the higher stakes (i.e. modifying the Wire Act). Also a Kyl win will position him to have a great deal of say in how this law is enacted. This guy's sole purpose in life it has seemed is to stop online gambling. #2 (and distant) answer would be revenge. |
|
#166
|
|||
|
|||
|
sure if you want to break the law
|
|
#167
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cowboyzfan!!!
First off it's Kyl not Kyle... 2nd... It's not a vote for a Dem... It's support for KYL's opponent... 3rd... You've been working real hard to stop any momentum in any idea with frequent paranoid comments about Democratic duping on 2+2... 4th...If the rest of us thought the way you do... We would be pretty sure that YOU ARE A REPUBLICAN FLY IN THE DEMOCRATIC OINTMENT OUT TO STOP ANY MOMENTUM GATHERD ON THIS SITE... 5th... SHUT THE %#&* UP and pull your Clearly Partisan head out of our Bi Partisan rears... |
|
#168
|
|||
|
|||
|
first of all i know his name. secondly, you prove my point about Democratic homers on this site. There is NOTHING Democratic about poker. Thirdly, I probably hate Kyl more than you but i hope you give his opponent all you have.
|
|
#169
|
|||
|
|||
|
knowing that he has a vocal opposition is something that kyl has not had previously. i am thrilled that he understands that we do care!
|
|
#170
|
|||
|
|||
|
No you prove my point about your Partisan Head.
|
![]() |
|
|