Doyles "Rush" concept

[Hendricks433]

In Super System Doyle talks about how when he wins a pot he automatically plays the next and normally for a raise. This allows him to go on a "rush". I believe in rushes and havent tried this but I was interested in what some of you guys think. I assume no one has really tried it but what are your guys thoughts?

[OMGTILTING]

I think this is so much [censored]!

[carnivalhobo]

although i like SS, i think this is a crappy concept. Online many people wont even know what happened in the last hand, much less who exactly won it unless it was huge. No reason to put yourself in -EV situations like raising 72o UTG just because you won the last pot. Its always nice to win a few in a row, but trying to force it is really a poor idea IMO.

[loveminuszero]

the idea obviously isn't that you're more likely to win the hand becuase you won the last one, but rather the difference is in how players perceive you

[bruin]

look up "gamblers fallacy" on google

[ASD99]

yeah this concept is wayyy overratated IMO and can get average players into a lot of trouble.

[ReptileHouse]

[ QUOTE ]
the idea obviously isn't that you're more likely to win the hand becuase you won the last one, but rather the difference is in how players perceive you

[/ QUOTE ]

[4_2_it]

Online this concept is beyond useless. If you play live and can get a table reputation like Doyle's then I think it would work fine for you.

[pho75]

I think it has "some" merit. We tend to play better when we're winning and worse when we're loosing.

[Speedlimits]

[ QUOTE ]
In Super System Doyle talks about how when he wins a pot he automatically plays the next and normally for a raise. This allows him to go on a "rush". I believe in rushes and havent tried this but I was interested in what some of you guys think. I assume no one has really tried it but what are your guys thoughts?

[/ QUOTE ]

He doesn't automatically play anything. lol...