![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ran into a situation playing a SNG on party today. Don't have HH, but not really necessary.
Blinds at 100-200, UTG raises to 400, I call, and BB pushes, a raise of 75 more. UTG reraises over top, and I fold. Question is this: Was that raise enough to re-open the betting? B/C my call was based on that not being the case, and I ended up having to let the hand go. What's the TDA rule? Does party follow that? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had this on party today, I'm BB and the blinds are 200, Button calls, SB raises all-in with 240 chips, I call. and button raises all-in. Horsecr@p, but I guess that's the way they play it.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The TDA rule is that the all-in raise has to be at least the amount of the previous raise for the action to reopen for the previous raiser and everybody who's acted after that raise.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Was this a sng? I've never seen this.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's a bug in Party's software. Use it to your advantage.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll certainly keep it in mind, I just wanted to see if I was right. Last time it'll burn me.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
i thought it was regularly 50% of the original amount, not 100% to reopen betting.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's strange though. There have been times when I could re-raise and when I couldn't. It happens so rarely, that I can't recall the differences in the situations.
Maybe I'll just start putting in raises with ATC when there's a shorty likely to go all in and figure it out. |
![]() |
|
|