Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-13-2006, 05:07 PM
AceCR9 AceCR9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: railbird coaching, $100/hr
Posts: 3,952
Default Re: River decision vs Antonio Esfandiari

[ QUOTE ]
None of you think he has a hand like 4s5s? He could even have a hand like As4s or As5s. He could be calling turn for str8 and flush draw now.

[/ QUOTE ]

wouldn't a "play happy" agrro player like Antonio raise the turn with a big draw? From his Point of view hero could easily have a mid pp, so now the over card hits, he raises(possibly AI, depending on stack size). and makes hero most likely fold mid pp's.


as played I think your good on this river. I really like ck/cl OR as was suggested above making a weak block bet and calling his shove.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-13-2006, 05:22 PM
neon neon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 495
Default Re: River decision vs Antonio Esfandiari

My initial reaction was check-call all day.

Raptor almost has me convinced that bet-call is an equally viable option, since I agree that a player of Antonio's caliber is certainly capable of bluff-raising a weak river lead from OP w/ 44-88, which I think comprises a pretty large part of his range.

Only problem is, there's a pretty good chunk of his range that's now ahead of us, too; A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K3s, and of course big flopped hands like threes full and A2s and whatnot . . . So the bet-call line would be giving him at least an extra grand or so as opposed to check-calling . . . Guess it comes down to just how often he's gonna bluff shove the river if we bet like $600-$800, and I honestly think it's pretty close . . .

But I prolly still just check-call.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-13-2006, 05:28 PM
KRANTZ KRANTZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the 1980s
Posts: 4,999
Default Re: River decision vs Antonio Esfandiari

neon- if he bets, he assumes you're going to call, no? so how often is he really going to bluff like this?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 09-13-2006, 05:48 PM
subblime subblime is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 22
Default Re: River decision vs Antonio Esfandiari

Seems like a lot of ppl are saying he is very aggro and will bluff given the opportunity. If we've decided to pay off his flush/nutz/etc, then might as well max out against his bluffs.

So something that looks like a blocking bet will more often get raised then a check (which could be a trap or just a hand that's committed to check-call). Make an obvious blocking bet and pay off the raise. If he raises here 100% of the time, we win.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 09-13-2006, 05:48 PM
poker1O1 poker1O1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sitting here in ventrilo
Posts: 2,321
Default Re: River decision vs Antonio Esfandiari

I like a 1/2 pot bet.
checking appears that you have a hand and what to show it down cheaply, but not worth value betting.
betting out appears that you might be trying to push him off a hand or that you have a very strong hand, and this is a very hard river for him to bluff raise you given the consistent strength you've shown throughout the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 09-13-2006, 05:52 PM
neon neon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 495
Default Re: River decision vs Antonio Esfandiari

[ QUOTE ]
neon- if he bets, he assumes you're going to call, no? so how often is he really going to bluff like this?

[/ QUOTE ]

If we check the river here, I definitely think Antonio's gonna fire off a bluff w/ a middling pocket pair some percentage of the time; that's a pretty nasty board for JJ-99, and not an easy call (as evidenced by everyone suggesting a check-fold w/ both AQ/AK in this spot) with AK, which together comprise a significant portion of hero's range . . .
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-13-2006, 06:18 PM
FGators FGators is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,339
Default Re: River decision vs Antonio Esfandiari

Good table selection. I like a check/call here.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 09-13-2006, 06:23 PM
Ansky Ansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: pokersavvyplus.com!
Posts: 13,541
Default Re: River decision vs Antonio Esfandiari

[ QUOTE ]
Good table selection. I like a check/call here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah you're right just cause there is 1 solid player at the 6 max table I shouldn't sit.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 09-13-2006, 06:27 PM
Parlay Slow Parlay Slow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Proud to be Polish!
Posts: 3,869
Default Re: River decision vs Antonio Esfandiari

[ QUOTE ]
Good table selection. I like a check/call here.

[/ QUOTE ]

god you are such a f'n moron
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 09-13-2006, 09:49 PM
innerpeace innerpeace is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In deep meditation
Posts: 215
Default Re: River decision vs Antonio Esfandiari

in the situation you described, i prefer c/c. antonio is aggressive, at least in live games, especially when he has position. his firing range on the river is too large not to call a reasonable size bet. given that you've never played him before, i would avoid making a blocking bet because that smells of weakness and you don't have enough of a read to know how to react if he reraises you. there are two golden rules here: (1) bet only if you know what to do if you get raised (2) small hand / small pot.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.