Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old 09-06-2006, 04:17 PM
NMcNasty NMcNasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
Default Re: beating the big NL games..

I'm hostile toward the shortstacking strategy because its ruining internet poker at the higher levels and I want to discourage its use as much as possible. Do you not agree that it harms the games at the higher levels?

Also you're right the issue has been beaten to death, but then why would you say something like "I thought the action behind you was part of poker". Its not like im calling raises with suited connectors then suddenly finding out there's a shortstacker behind me. Marginal hands become less profitable with shortstacks behind you but not necessarily unprofitable. I might still have correct odds to call with 68 but then when a shortstack pushes allin there's nothing I can do but grumble. Maybe you should reread a couple of those 5 million posts so you can grasp this concept.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.