Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > Tournament Circuit/WSOP
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:37 PM
ZBTHorton ZBTHorton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SSNL Coaches PM ME!!
Posts: 6,587
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

Can someone please explain to me what's wrong with calling a 36 year old man middle aged? I don't understand.

I thought Gold was about 40. People usually live to be 70-80. That's the middle. If 35-40 isn't middle aged, what is?
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:40 PM
Victor Victor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,773
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

zbt,

do you really think the early 20s male demographic needs to be further incited to play poker? every frat boy i know already plays poker. hell, look at the average age of 2p2.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:42 PM
ZBTHorton ZBTHorton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SSNL Coaches PM ME!!
Posts: 6,587
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
zbt,

do you really think the early 20s male demographic needs to be further incited to play poker? every frat boy i know already plays poker. hell, look at the average age of 2p2.

[/ QUOTE ]

Their aren't many demographics that I think have alot of marketing potential left. The reason I focus on people being younger is because I see a younger person more likely to play online poker. 2p2 should be a good example, since our avg age on this forum is probbaly in the mid 20's, if not younger.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:42 PM
dogdrool dogdrool is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: bagging elephants
Posts: 1,779
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
Can someone please explain to me what's wrong with calling a 36 year old man middle aged? I don't understand.

I thought Gold was about 40. People usually live to be 70-80. That's the middle. If 35-40 isn't middle aged, what is?

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, sorry to to break it to you, but a 36 year old man isn't middle aged for the same reasons a 19 year old isn't a teenager. We call a 19 year old a "young adult" because he can go to war and vote and buy smokes.

Somebody needs to enter their 40s to be middle aged. Somebody in their 40s is probably going to be out of place hitting a nightclub with coworkers on Friday night. Some guy who is 36 can do anything that a 29 year old can do, and nobody will question it. Somebody who is 43 cannot act like somebody who is 36.

That's just how it goes.
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:42 PM
RacersEdge RacersEdge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Der Fristland
Posts: 5,393
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

I think he will be very good for the game because his table talking will make for great TV when it airs on ESPN in a couple weeks. He's an intriguing character and it will make people see that you don't have to be straight-faced and stoic to win a poker tournament.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:42 PM
Kneel B4 Zod Kneel B4 Zod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nobody roots for Goliath
Posts: 11,725
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
Can someone please explain to me what's wrong with calling a 36 year old man middle aged? I don't understand.

I thought Gold was about 40. People usually live to be 70-80. That's the middle. If 35-40 isn't middle aged, what is?

[/ QUOTE ]
wiki:

Middle age is a non-specific stage in life when one is neither young nor old, but somewhere in between.

This is considered by some to be the ages around, or older than, the middle of the average life span of human beings. In developed societies, people are generally considered to be middle aged between the ages of 40 and 60.

(just sayin...personally I have no problem w/ calling Gold middle aged_
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:43 PM
ZBTHorton ZBTHorton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SSNL Coaches PM ME!!
Posts: 6,587
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Can someone please explain to me what's wrong with calling a 36 year old man middle aged? I don't understand.

I thought Gold was about 40. People usually live to be 70-80. That's the middle. If 35-40 isn't middle aged, what is?

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, sorry to to break it to you, but a 36 year old man isn't middle aged for the same reasons a 19 year old isn't a teenager. We call a 19 year old a "young adult" because he can go to war and vote and buy smokes.

Somebody needs to enter their 40s to be middle aged. Somebody in their 40s is probably going to be out of place hitting a nightclub with coworkers on Friday night. Some guy who is 36 can do anything that a 29 year old can do, and nobody will question it. Somebody who is 43 cannot act like somebody who is 36.

That's just how it goes.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I don't understand how these things differ at all. I guess maybe "middle aged" isn't an insult to me, just an observation. Some people seem to take it as an insult. Which is what I don't get.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:45 PM
ZBTHorton ZBTHorton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SSNL Coaches PM ME!!
Posts: 6,587
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Can someone please explain to me what's wrong with calling a 36 year old man middle aged? I don't understand.

I thought Gold was about 40. People usually live to be 70-80. That's the middle. If 35-40 isn't middle aged, what is?

[/ QUOTE ]
wiki:

Middle age is a non-specific stage in life when one is neither young nor old, but somewhere in between.

This is considered by some to be the ages around, or older than, the middle of the average life span of human beings. In developed societies, people are generally considered to be middle aged between the ages of 40 and 60.

(just sayin...personally I have no problem w/ calling Gold middle aged_

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, so this whole argument is over 4 years. 4 years that I didn't even know existed when I made my OP. (I didn't know his exact age at the time, just made a generalization).
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:49 PM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

I had this debate earlier and reading this, my mind is kind of changed - I felt Gold wasn't good for poker, he was somewhat of a douche, but he played well at the Final Table from what I saw, using his big chip-stack to drive people off their hands. He is personable, and he has a good (and sad) story. I think poker has been really lucky to have 3 winners like Hachem, Moneymaker, and Raymer - and I don't think Allen Cunningham would've been a good winner either. Of the players at the final table, it almost seems like Gold is the best choice.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 08-11-2006, 05:56 PM
archangel archangel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jens Lehmann must die.
Posts: 663
Default Re: Jamie Gold...Worst Possible Winner?

i love Jamie Gold as the new WSOP World Champion if only because his win serves as a big "F U" to all the people who think that poker should be the exclusive domain of "internet whiz-kids" and "name poker pros" and that anyone who doesn't fall into either category MUST be a know-nothing "donk".

signed,
a 31yo guy who is apparently rapidly approaching middle-age

EDIT: i should have added a third category exempt from ridicule: "2p2ers, especially 'known' 2p2ers".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.