WSOP Day 7 Main Event Thread

[Kevmath]

Vorhaus' blog said there was only one spade in Einhorn's hand.

[alvaroaze]

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe the A was really a spade also?

[/ QUOTE ]

its says he thought for a few minutes before calling. if he had the nut flush draw i think he wouldnt take that long...

[Jourdain]

[ QUOTE ]
Man, this is becoming even more of a donkfest than it was before. Some of these plays with big Ms are just horrendous.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe they think that this is the WPT.

[betgo]

[ QUOTE ]
WTF is up with Einhorn's call of Holmes' all in with a gutshot and an overcard? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] It was a good call. He was getting 3-2 pot odds. Holms could have a draw or be bluffing the low paired flop. Einhorn was putting in 40% of the money and had a 27% win chance as is.
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=1886025
pokenum -h 6h 5h - ac 2s -- 5s 4d 4s
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing 5s 4s 4d
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
6h 5h 720 72.73 270 27.27 0 0.00 0.727
2s Ac 270 27.27 720 72.73 0 0.00 0.273

[Lawman007]

If Cunningham can hang in there with a decent stack, he might be able to win against these internet maniacs.

[nolanfan34]

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, we are... if the action really went that way, its a [carebear] stupid play.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it's much more likely that the pre-flop action isn't being reported in full. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of these hands were blind/button hands, for example.

Trying to analyze these hands is pointless, because every player on 2+2 who has been covered by Cardplayer usually comes back later and says they butchered the hands. Why assume anything today is correct?

[Dynasty]

The Ms keep going up. At a 7-handed table, the average stack has an M of ~ 36.

[betgo]

[ QUOTE ]
Man, this is becoming even more of a donkfest than it was before. Some of these plays with big Ms are just horrendous.

[/ QUOTE ]
The people who played safe have already been blinded off.

[RacersEdge]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
WTF is up with Einhorn's call of Holmes' all in with a gutshot and an overcard? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] It was a good call. He was getting 3-2 pot odds. Holms could have a draw or be bluffing the low paired flop. Einhorn was putting in 40% of the money and had a 27% win chance as is.
http://twodimes.net/h/?z=1886025
pokenum -h 6h 5h - ac 2s -- 5s 4d 4s
Holdem Hi: 990 enumerated boards containing 5s 4s 4d
cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV
6h 5h 720 72.73 270 27.27 0 0.00 0.727
2s Ac 270 27.27 720 72.73 0 0.00 0.273

[/ QUOTE ]

Or put the guy on some wide hand range, and that probably gets over 40% pretty easily.

[RockMySocks]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, we are... if the action really went that way, its a [carebear] stupid play.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it's much more likely that the pre-flop action isn't being reported in full. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of these hands were blind/button hands, for example.

Trying to analyze these hands is pointless, because every player on 2+2 who has been covered by Cardplayer usually comes back later and says they butchered the hands. Why assume anything today is correct?

[/ QUOTE ]