Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-25-2006, 02:38 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 8,076
Default Re: Q9s marginal hand play

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
and maybe even a raise to see where you are standing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bet/raise for value and because you have the best hand. Any 'info' you get is tainted.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know how often hero is ahead of the guy who only plays 11% of his hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Since he pf-raises 6% of them, you know he doesn't have the best ones... he has the borderline ones. Maybe KQ, but he has a high aggression, so I'd expect a raise out of him.

KO

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd rather keep BB betting and see what STAG does on the turn. For a player that tight, the only hands that he can hold that you currently beat is probably KJ and MAYBE KT (JJ probably gets raised by 6% PFR).

Keep in mind that high AF comes from a combination of betting AND calling. If villain is weak postflop and does a lot of folding, then his fewer calls will drive the aggression up.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-25-2006, 02:54 PM
KingOtter KingOtter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NL25 6-max
Posts: 3,761
Default Re: Q9s marginal hand play

[ QUOTE ]

I'd rather keep BB betting and see what STAG does on the turn. For a player that tight, the only hands that he can hold that you currently beat is probably KJ and MAYBE KT (JJ probably gets raised by 6% PFR).

Keep in mind that high AF comes from a combination of betting AND calling. If villain is weak postflop and does a lot of folding, then his fewer calls will drive the aggression up.

[/ QUOTE ]

Umm, aggression factor is a combination of raising and betting, not betting and calling, so I agree with the second sentence (more folds = less calls = higher aggression), but don't understand the first (aggression factor is betting and calling).

So with 1.9 he's twice as likely to bet/raise as call. So 66% of the time he bets, and 33% of the time he calls. He has 2 chances on the flop, and he calls both. Unless he is a good player and is 'changing speeds', or Hero has been aggressive and MP2 expects him to keep betting... or he doesn't have TP, IMO.

Yeah, I see the benefits of keeping BB in on the turn, cuz it allows STAG to raise BB's bet instead of our own, if he's going to.... having a read on the liklihood of MP2 to c/r would be nice.

Turn is tricky... what a lousy card. You have outs now against any hands he might have without a K. Check behind, I guess.

KO
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-25-2006, 03:29 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 8,076
Default Re: Q9s marginal hand play

[ QUOTE ]
Umm, aggression factor is a combination of raising and betting, not betting and calling, so I agree with the second sentence (more folds = less calls = higher aggression), but don't understand the first (aggression factor is betting and calling).

[/ QUOTE ]

To clarify: Aggression factor as the ratio of (bets/raises) to (calls) depends on both categories. So what I meant was that seeing high AF does not mean that villain value bets/raises at every possible instance. It could also mean that he's folding lots (instead of calling), so that when he's in a hand, he's got a pretty decent one, which he sometimes raises and sometimes calls. If he would raise AQ/KQ and just call with QJ, that would make a 2 AF.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-25-2006, 03:33 PM
Str8Fish Str8Fish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Thesis, jobs, defending, OH MY!
Posts: 2,929
Default Re: Q9s marginal hand play

10/6/2 isn't TAG is it? That's a rock. Knowing that, he only limps in 10% of his hands?!?!? That's so crazy... i'd be hella suspicious with him limping in. On the flop here, we still have top pair, but I'd still be cautious with what MP3 is calling the raise with. Do you have any information on how often this guy c/r the turn? My next move would definitely be to raise, but be careful on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-25-2006, 03:35 PM
Str8Fish Str8Fish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Thesis, jobs, defending, OH MY!
Posts: 2,929
Default Re: Q9s marginal hand play

On the turn, this is where I would tread cautiously against this guy. I'd check behind him HU against the rock.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-25-2006, 03:35 PM
kiemo kiemo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,745
Default Re: Q9s marginal hand play

I like the flop bet.

I would fire again on the turn with intention checking behind the river.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-25-2006, 03:39 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 8,076
Default Re: Q9s marginal hand play

[ QUOTE ]
Ok, I raised for value figuring MP3 would've probably raised if he had a Q and I wasn't worried about BB. How about the turn...

Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB checks.

Flop: (4.50 SB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, MP2 folds, MP3 calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, BB folds, MP3 calls.

Turn: (4.75 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
MP3 checks, Hero ???

[/ QUOTE ]

As played, I think you can bet-fold (probably check behind on the river). It's better than checking behind and calling a river bet, and if you're going to raise the flop, there's no point in calling to fold the river UI. The bet here is a value bet in case villain happens to be on KJ or maybe KT and will definitely pay one more bet to see the river. I don't know if he pays off with KJ or KT on the river, which is why I probably check behind.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-25-2006, 03:44 PM
brentlip brentlip is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lurker 4 Life
Posts: 48
Default Re: Q9s marginal hand play

[ QUOTE ]


Yeah, I see the benefits of keeping BB in on the turn, cuz it allows STAG to raise BB's bet instead of our own, if he's going to.... having a read on the liklihood of MP2 to c/r would be nice.

Turn is tricky... what a lousy card. You have outs now against any hands he might have without a K. Check behind, I guess.

KO

[/ QUOTE ]

Lousy card indeed.

He's only check raised twice before. Once on the flop and once on the turn. (I didn't know this at the time)

I'm not sure I see the benefits of keeping BB in on the turn. He probably has a bad hand or nothing with 1 overcard I want him to pay right (he does a lot of the time)?

Also, what do I do when I'm facing 2 on the turn because MP3 picks up a J and an OESD (or he has me crushed)? This puts me in a difficult situation because he's probably aware of how BB plays and now I'm worried about BB 3 betting AND being crushed by MP3.

However, if he raises the turn or donks me on the turn after I raised the flop shows more strength than a turn raise (to BBs turn bet) if I only called the flop.

Anyway, I checked behind on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-25-2006, 04:19 PM
Bodizapha Bodizapha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: nj, usa
Posts: 224
Default Re: Q9s marginal hand play

I'd bet the turn. If he c/r you then you know you are probably beat. BTW, nice raise on the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-25-2006, 04:48 PM
KingOtter KingOtter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NL25 6-max
Posts: 3,761
Default Re: Q9s marginal hand play

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Umm, aggression factor is a combination of raising and betting, not betting and calling, so I agree with the second sentence (more folds = less calls = higher aggression), but don't understand the first (aggression factor is betting and calling).

[/ QUOTE ]

To clarify: Aggression factor as the ratio of (bets/raises) to (calls) depends on both categories. So what I meant was that seeing high AF does not mean that villain value bets/raises at every possible instance. It could also mean that he's folding lots (instead of calling), so that when he's in a hand, he's got a pretty decent one, which he sometimes raises and sometimes calls. If he would raise AQ/KQ and just call with QJ, that would make a 2 AF.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know why you only chose those three hands as an example because he'll call with many draws, too. This means he's even more likely to bet a Q, since he has to to compensate for calling the draws.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.