Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-21-2006, 02:27 PM
James. James. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: McFadden for Heisman
Posts: 5,963
Default Re: TPTK sandwiched between aggressors

nice post TPH. i agree.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:14 PM
Haupt_234 Haupt_234 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: wtf is a job?
Posts: 3,716
Default Re: TPTK sandwiched between aggressors

I agree with TPH on a flop fold.

Haupt_234
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:28 PM
XmasXmas XmasXmas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: texas
Posts: 490
Default Re: TPTK sandwiched between aggressors

rant ahead. skip if you want.

i believe it is very possible for you to respond w/o commenting on the pf action. i do own sshe and have read through it several times. the reason why i said please don't comment on pf is for a few reasons.

i've posted a few hands recently that resulted in many people suggesting to fold pf (almost certainly incorrectly). discussion. pf hand selection by position has been well documented and well discussed to the point where i don't feel that this is the right place to be talking about it.

poker is an extremely complicated game. it doesn't boil down to charts, tables, and rules of thumb. if we make the situation extreme, and say that if UTG+2 raises every single hand, would you fold AJo? you wouldn't (or i hope). instead, you'd be looking for a remotely decent hand to try to isolate with and go with it. i felt that UTG+2 is getting out of line with his pf raises and wanted to isolate w/ some high cards. the added money from the poster makes this play even more enticing.

writing a post that summarizes into "read sshe and it will tell you not to 3-bet an EP raiser w/ AJo" detracts attention from quality, post-flop posts with genuine strategic information made by TPH, james, and nick royale. pf decisions will make a losing player into a break even player, but one cannot become a winning player without being able to play post flop with finesse.

i had posted this hand b/c a situation had arisen to where i am confronted with the possibility of having to fold a good hand in a big pot -- something that is counterintuitive. i wanted to hear what my colleagues had to say about it, and not about some marginal, unimportant, and boring pf decision that i know is generally incorrect.

with all that said, thank you all for your valuable input on this hand.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:35 PM
Man of Means Man of Means is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 1,244
Default Re: TPTK sandwiched between aggressors

CO is unknown and it would be either collusive action or he's a complete tool if he goes this crazy without an overpair or JJ. I agree with Fold flop for 2, and hope it goes to showdown so you can get a read.

Preflop is understandable, I will 3-bet AJ without hesitation against someone playing super-LAG
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-21-2006, 05:28 PM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sverige
Posts: 6,815
Default Re: TPTK sandwiched between aggressors

Oh, I assumed that CO in this hand was the LAG UTG+2 was having a contest with. If CO is unknown this flop fold is really super easy.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-22-2006, 05:49 AM
QueBob QueBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 200
Default Re: TPTK sandwiched between aggressors

Mason's books have some great insight into non-self weighting stratagies. You're making strategic errors, plain and simple, but your ego is refusing the debate. Analyzing your play is pointless as long as you refuse to accept the concept of a dominated hand.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-22-2006, 12:55 PM
XmasXmas XmasXmas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: texas
Posts: 490
Default Re: TPTK sandwiched between aggressors

[ QUOTE ]
Mason's books have some great insight into non-self weighting stratagies. You're making strategic errors, plain and simple, but your ego is refusing the debate. Analyzing your play is pointless as long as you refuse to accept the concept of a dominated hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

what're you saying? following a self-weighting strategy is a bad thing as that implies i'm not adjusting for specific scenarios. i tried to do the opposite here.

since you have mentioned malmuth's name in two threads that i've seen, here is a quote for you.

[ QUOTE ]
Remember, the more self-weighting your opponent is, the poorer he plays.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.