![]() |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
If bankroll management is part of the game, then leaving a table after hitting a certain percentage of your bankroll should be part of the game too. If players should only risk 5% of their bankroll per buy-in, then they should probably be leaving if they manage to double up or more otherwise they end up risking 10% or more of their bankroll.
A player that risks only 5-10% of their bankroll at a time is a lot less likely to go broke. Table selection can also provide a player with an reason to move from table to table. Banking profit may be invetible especially with the max buy-in at most sites. Applying a single table rule (not banking profit) while still in the game to typical online multiple table session play doesn't seem reasonable. It's based on a B&M single table poker game where it's impossible for players to be playing more than one table at a time. The online poker game is different and all the rules associated with classic B&M poker aren't necessarily applicable. I think OP grider bankroll management system is silly but not because he's a ratholer. If I understand correctly, he's risking $50 to win $5 or $10. I can't imagine that's going to work out in the long run for him. |
|
|