Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 07-10-2006, 12:54 AM
Rick Nebiolo Rick Nebiolo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,634
Default Re: Sticky Showdown Conundrum – I’m genuinely confused!

[ QUOTE ]
I work as floor/TD in Vienna and although we do not have the IWTSTH rule we have a rule that states "a winning hand must be shown to receive the pot". The rule is strictly enforced in tournaments while in cashgames I instruct the dealers to only enforce it when requested by other players.

[/ QUOTE ]

Upon quick reflection, this rule appears to have merit (and I like the way you interpret it for cash games). Perhaps worth a thread of its own at some future date.


[ QUOTE ]
To answer your question under my rooms existing rules I would have the hand tabled. But I would rather rule that since player A did not show when he was supposed to he has forfeited his right to see player B's cards.

[/ QUOTE ]

Using the catch all "management reserves the right to make rulings not listed explicitly in the rulebook that reflect the spirit of fairness" was used by a couple of managers I've spoken with regarding this and a few other problems they are having. But its best to have an explicit rule if the situation comes up often and the rule is a good one.

~ Rick
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.