Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-07-2006, 09:53 PM
Sooga Sooga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: southern cali
Posts: 2,294
Default Re: Why can\'t Adam Dunn hit?

like i said in the original post, BA is a pretty hollow stat, but there is a world of difference between a .300/.380 hitter (who i would consider 'elite) and a .240/.380 hitter (Dunn).
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-07-2006, 09:54 PM
HLMencken HLMencken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,180
Default Re: Why can\'t Adam Dunn hit?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He's still an extremely productive hitter.

[/ QUOTE ]

...depending on your definition of productive, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, you idiot. By any non-retarded definition of productive, he is in the upper eschelons of productivity.

Mebenhoe, can we ban this moron?

[/ QUOTE ]

I was playing on Thayers statement that he was elite depending on definition of elite... was that too subtle for you?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-07-2006, 09:57 PM
THAY3R THAY3R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Great White Hope
Posts: 9,755
Default Re: Why can\'t Adam Dunn hit?

[ QUOTE ]
like i said in the original post, BA is a pretty hollow stat, but there is a world of difference between a .300/.380 hitter (who i would consider 'elite) and a .240/.380 hitter (Dunn).

[/ QUOTE ]

Assuming they have the same Slugging percentage, what is the world of difference?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-07-2006, 09:57 PM
Sooga Sooga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: southern cali
Posts: 2,294
Default remarks

Ok let's get some things straight. Dunn is a productive hitter. I said this in my OP. He is certainly in the 'upper echelons' as a hitter.

But those of you who think he's one of the best hitters in the league are clearly on crack. How can you possibly make a statement like that?? The 'best hitters', surprisingly, make hits. Dunn does not. Dunn gets on base a ton and hits home runs, which leads to his productivity. But he is by no means one of the 'best hitters' in baseball.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-07-2006, 10:00 PM
Sooga Sooga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: southern cali
Posts: 2,294
Default Re: Why can\'t Adam Dunn hit?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
like i said in the original post, BA is a pretty hollow stat, but there is a world of difference between a .300/.380 hitter (who i would consider 'elite) and a .240/.380 hitter (Dunn).

[/ QUOTE ]

Assuming they have the same Slugging percentage, what is the world of difference?

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you serious or are you joking? The difference is that those 60 extra batting average points equate directly to hits, and hits with men on base usually drive in runs, and you need runs to win games.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-07-2006, 10:00 PM
PokerFink PokerFink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Keyra is back
Posts: 7,209
Default Re: remarks

Hitter One: .300/.380/.400
Hitter Two: .235/.380/.550

Who is better?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-07-2006, 10:01 PM
MrFeelNothin MrFeelNothin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rockies Fever
Posts: 2,052
Default Re: Why can\'t Adam Dunn hit?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Interesting fact :

Adam Dunn has a higher Career On-Base Percentage than Ichiro.

[/ QUOTE ]

There ya go! Adam Dunn must be a better leadoff hitter!

(How again was Joe Morgan wrong...?)

[/ QUOTE ]

You're way off here dude. Adam Dunn would be a great leadoff hitter, HOWEVER his ability to hit HRs and 2Bs makes him far more valuable as a middle of the lineup guy. If Ichiro hit for power it would be very dumb to leave him in the leadoff position . Even though he is a great leadoff hitter, there would be more value elsewhere.

And yes, Joe Morgan was wrong. Getting on base is the most important thing a leadoff hitter does.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-07-2006, 10:03 PM
kyleb kyleb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: the death of baseball
Posts: 10,765
Default Re: remarks

[ QUOTE ]
Hitter One: .300/.380/.400
Hitter Two: .235/.380/.550

Who is better?

[/ QUOTE ]

How is this close:

Hitter One: .300 BA
Hitter Two: .235 BA

I mean, duh.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-07-2006, 10:04 PM
prohornblower prohornblower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: learning the hockey-stop.
Posts: 8,016
Default Re: remarks

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hitter One: .300/.380/.400
Hitter Two: .235/.380/.550

Who is better?

[/ QUOTE ]

How is this close:

Hitter One: .300 BA
Hitter Two: .235 BA

I mean, duh.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who would you rather have up with 2 outs and a guy on 2nd?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-07-2006, 10:05 PM
HLMencken HLMencken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,180
Default Re: remarks

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hitter One: .300/.380/.400
Hitter Two: .235/.380/.550

Who is better?

[/ QUOTE ]

How is this close:

Hitter One: .300 BA
Hitter Two: .235 BA

I mean, duh.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who would you rather have up with 2 outs and a guy on 2nd?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ummmm... the guy who is more likely to get a hit? DUH. Hitter one.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.