|
|
#51
07-03-2006, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: whore this, ubersucker
You're just as likely to get to 390 as to bust, say, since you give up a bit of advantage to the house.
Betting $10 is fine strategy. Your risk of ruin is [to me] acceptably small, and you aren't going to waste too much time wagering. Then again, I'd say the same ting if you bet $50/hand, which is likely what I'd bet. For risk of ruin, check out http://wizardofodds.com/blackjack/appendix12.html. your case is 250 hands, and you began with 20 bets, so your risk of ruin should be between 20 and 30%, about 27%. 
|
|
#52
07-03-2006, 04:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: whore this, ubersucker
[ QUOTE ]
No that's not what I'm saying. Sorry I know I'm being confusing. I don't care about that tiny sample size. I'm wondering what the odds are, simply, of busting the casino before I clear 2050, and before I clear 2500, assuming I am making $10 bets and start with 200. Sorry for the confusion. [/ QUOTE ] When you figure out your number, figure out mine. I busted at Omni flat betting $5 and only cleared $900 of the WR. Bet my number is WAY more impossible [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
