What % of the Pros are winners at the High Stakes NLH?

[TraiViet]

I've been around different websites and i've seen the game have been tighten up quite a bit.Party and Pokerstar are the only one with full rings high stakes games and the action is very tight (flop seen is under 30%).The short hand NLH is becoming more popular now. My questions are:
1)What is the % of the pros are winners at 5/10 NL or higher? What is the % of those that break even?
2) Should I change/transform my game to short handed NLH?

[yvesaint]

why would you go pro if you werent a winner

[Cesaro]

um...all of them?

[invisibleleadsoup]

i'm a professional loser at high stakes poker
its hard work but i've got to pay the bills somehow

[Hielko]

Being a professional loser must be a tough job....

[captZEEbo]

the same joke 5 times in a row just gets funnier and funnier!

[9cao]

In terms of their true and current win-rate, I wouldn't be surprised if something like 25% of pros are not winning players in their current main game.

[g-p]

[ QUOTE ]
the same joke 5 times in a row just gets funnier and funnier!

[/ QUOTE ]
but seriously, imagine losing then going pro. ROFL

[Ansky]

Where do these ppl come from. Can someone explain?

[GTL]

He obviously meant what percentage of the players in the game are winners? or what percentage of the players in the game are pros? He would have still been flamed though. So no big deal.