![]() |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have pretty much all the 2+2 books, and about 20 other poker books.
The best strategy poker I ever read, in terms of helping my game (limit holdem) the most is SSH. Other good strategy books I'd recommend: HOH series, TOP, and Middle Limit Holdem. My favorite poker mentology books are Inside the Poker Mind, and Improve Your Poker. My favorite story telling poker book is The Professor, The Banker, and The Suicide King. This is probably my choice for greatest poker themed book. |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
In aditional to the known classics i would add Phil Gordon's
little green book. He has an interesting point of view on NLH which includes agresion and mathematical calculations of many things. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
what is SSHE?
|
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
what is SSHE? [/ QUOTE ] Small Stakes Holdem: Winning Big With Expert Play, by Miller, Sklansky and Malmuth. It's good. PS - thanks jfk for your reply. I play live so Ill get Caro's book, and you saved me $ on SS. |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well, I suppose I'll say a few things.
Most Educational: Theory of Poker. It was an eye opener. Most Fun to Read: SuperSystem. I really liked the way the book read. It was like I was having a conversation with Doyle about the game, unlike the 2+2 textbook style. Worst Book: Play Poker Like the Pros. It was one of the first books I read, and even back then I knew it was crap. "Phil's Top Ten" strategy for limit hold'em is ridiculous. Honorable Mention: HOH I and II. I haven't read III yet. The first two could have stood a proofreading to catch minor errors, but other than that, they're both excellent. Especially book two, which introduced several groundbreaking concepts that have already become common in strategy discussion. |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
Apparently nobody in this thread has read No Limit Hold'em: Theory and Practice.
My Top Three 1) TOP obviously 2) NLHETAP 3) HOH complete series I know, I know, Super-System this, Super-System that. IMO, the NLHE section is washed up. "Pound your opponents." I only play small stakes NLHE, but this general advice will break you quick. GET NLHETAP!! |
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] All poker means the same thing to them. They know the game is all luck. Also remember that this is gambling and no concept is infalliable. I am sure you have all seen people catch the case card and beat the hand when they should have not been involved in the hand in the first place. That is why they call it gambling. Remember no matter what the odds are if the person catches the odds go out the window...but the correct call , fold raise, reraise will win in the long haul. [/ QUOTE ] Uh, poker is all luck? Then why do the same people win? I know this is probably just your ranting about the bs that happens in poker, but still...come on. [/ QUOTE ] You misunderstood what he said. Can't blame you, though, as it was hard to read. |
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Apparently nobody in this thread has read No Limit Hold'em: Theory and Practice. [/ QUOTE ] Might be just me, but I didn't find it great..hell, I didn't find it good. |
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I know, I know, Super-System this, Super-System that. IMO, the NLHE section is washed up. "Pound your opponents." I only play small stakes NLHE, but this general advice will break you quick. GET NLHETAP!! [/ QUOTE ] I agree. Even Doyle says he doesn't play that way anymore. Times change and players have to change with the times. I noticed Doyle has written some columns recently that contradicts some of what he preached in SS 2. It doesn't mean he was wrong back then or is a hypocrite now. It just means he understands the importance of adapting to the changes. This is what makes NLHETAP so relevant to me. It goes against the grain of what many experts say, because it is so timely. |
![]() |
|
|