Would you rather be bigger or taller(NSFW)?

[WDC]

I would also like to have very thin legs so that my package looks bigger by comparison.

[TxRedMan]

[ QUOTE ]
This is a re-do of the thread that I just made because it was deleted by accident.

So let's get this thread going again.

Would you rather be 6'5" with a 5.5" inch penis or 5'7" with a 9" inch penis? Assume average circumference for that length in both cases. Most women prefer taller men with larger penises. You are either sacrificing height or length, and the choice is up to you.

So let's hear some thoughts.

[/ QUOTE ]

[Hack]

The first. one and it is not close. Right now I am 6'3" with an average sized wang.

[Milo]

I've talked to many couples in counseling, discussed many a sexual complaint, and shared an apartment in college with three women for a while in college. I've been privy to "girl talk" a whole hell of a lot (although not as much as the actual girls here), and have heard MANY women's complaints about men. I've heard exactly three comments about men being too small (and only one was actually complaining, the other two were just expressing surprise that the big tall man they went out with was not proportional). In fact, I've heard more complaints about men who are too big, than men who are too small. Use it right, keep them happy, and size usually matters little.

[Blarg]

[ QUOTE ]
The MR average link is good but I have an issue with it:

From my own experience, there are degrees of erection. When I am at my most erect I am bigger than when I am just slightly erect. So at what point are these studies measuring it? Obviously someone would be longer when they are just about to go, compared to someone who had just gotten hard.

[/ QUOTE ]

The study linked to looks decent for measuring accurately -- the man gets himself hard and then calls over two(!) nurses (!!) to measure him.

[Hack]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The MR average link is good but I have an issue with it:

From my own experience, there are degrees of erection. When I am at my most erect I am bigger than when I am just slightly erect. So at what point are these studies measuring it? Obviously someone would be longer when they are just about to go, compared to someone who had just gotten hard.

[/ QUOTE ]

The study linked to looks decent for measuring accurately -- the man gets himself hard and then calls over two(!) nurses (!!) to measure him.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh i'm not saying that the study wasn't accurate or consistent. i'm just saying that maybe the penis sizes across the board were underestimated.

what i'm really asking though is at which point do you get the accurate measurement? at the peak length?

[MicroBob]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The MR average link is good but I have an issue with it:

From my own experience, there are degrees of erection. When I am at my most erect I am bigger than when I am just slightly erect. So at what point are these studies measuring it? Obviously someone would be longer when they are just about to go, compared to someone who had just gotten hard.

[/ QUOTE ]

The study linked to looks decent for measuring accurately -- the man gets himself hard and then calls over two(!) nurses (!!) to measure him.

[/ QUOTE ]


it's spring break college kids so I wonder if alcohol could also limit erection size a tad and alter the results.

[Blarg]

They disqualified the kids who couldn't get it up at all. I dunno if or how they might or could disqualify something like a "partial."

It's probably partially compensated for by the fact that older guys tend to have pecker shrink, so measuring kids would tend to exaggerate the size of the peckers of the rest of the male population.

[MicroBob]

I agree with it being partly compensated by that aspect perhaps.


But I wasn't speaking of disqualifying those with a 'partial'.
Rather there were probably some who were a half-inch or so less than their TRUE peak because of alcohol...or perhaps nervousness in the lab setting or something....or a combination of the two.