three river call/fold decisions

[IHateCats]

Those stats are rougly similar to what I have on you except the 6max stats are somewhat higher (just under 10% on both PFR and VPIP over a considerable sample size) than what I mentioned in an earlier post.

[samoleus]

Your stats may well be more accurate than my friends' stats Cats. I have no idea. I just know I see a lot of flops. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[IHateCats]

There is no denying that you see a lot of flops.

[fsuplayer]

just saw this thread.

great stuff. im glad you started posting some hands samoleus.

[CanIPlay]

1. Fold
2. Call
3. Fold

[gunslingner]

Hand#1: I dont think thagt your hand needs protection. You can call his bet on any non-flush river if you think that he was drawing...Check behind if he checks! As played.... I think you have to fold... Overpair+flush draw or AKd is a significant chunk of his hand range....

Hand#2: Your opponent knows that you have at least a ten when you call the turn. He is smart. You should fold. But I would call to make sure....

Hand#3: He easily can have 1010. Call

[Thundercat_]

[ QUOTE ]
I am 63/41 at six max and 42/27 at full ring

[/ QUOTE ]
Jesus, you make gus look like a stars multitabler. do you have your stats for SB and BB defending?I assume more of your vip comes from raising in nonblind positions, hard to see you making it work by defending the blinds all the time but might be wrong

[aggie]

[ QUOTE ]

Jesus, you make gus look like a stars multitabler. do you have your stats for SB and BB defending?I assume more of your vip comes from raising in nonblind positions, hard to see you making it work by defending the blinds all the time but might be wrong

[/ QUOTE ]

I think posting any detailed stats you guys may have on him is sort of a breach of ettiquette

[samoleus]

Hey thanks Aggie. Yeah, I suppose that I would appreciate if we didn't discuss this stuff too much. Personally, I don't use PT at all and just rely on my memory and feel for players, but I imagine that it might put me at something of a competitive disadvantage if this is discussed at length.

Thundercat, as to your question, I have absolutely no idea what my blind defending stats are. I just know that I defend my blinds a huge percentage of the time. I will defend with:

- good hands
- connected hands
- suited hands
- small opening raises
- against weak opening raises
- against frequent raisers

Of course, the weaker the raiser (and the better I am at reading him), the more likely I am to defend. Also, I am more "in the zone" in some sessions as opposed to others. When I feel like I am playing very well and making good decisions, I am more likely to defend with marginal (or worse) hands.

[IHateCats]

I for one have no intention of posting more detailed stats but for those who haven't played with you, the PFR and VPIP stats provide some context as to your extreme laggish tendencies, otherwise their responses won't really reflect the situation as it stands with your table image being what it is.

Samoleus' play is quite distinctive which is why I think it's best if those replying mention whether they have played a substantial # of hands with him as his table image/metagame is a HUGE part of his game and discussing hands in absence of that experience will not mean a lot.