![]() |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
This might not be even close to right, but...could you break it down mathematically based on this concept...
When I have (some range), I won't play when he has x. Or, when I have (some range), I will play when he has (some range). Of course, the rest of the table will make a difference to your play as well, however, with this new information, you would make a slight adjustment. |
|
|