Study: Did a 757 hit the Pentagon?

[chrisnice]

[ QUOTE ]
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...deoframes.html
I found the information about the lack of shadows interesting in this link.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty interesting that the government can pull off a huge conspiracy like a 9-11 but cant make a convincing photoshop.

[SheenFan]

Doesn't the date "Sep. 12, 2001" at "17:37" get you wondering that this may not be what actually happened on september 11th?!!!!!!
Furthermore, this silly video doesn't explain why there is only a 16 foot hole in the side of the Pentagon and why no engines were found, and why the lawn remained unscathed, and why they confiscated the real videos from the nearby citgo and sheraton.
Keep believing the "official" story.
Don't bother to look at alternative views.

[benfranklin]

[ QUOTE ]

Furthermore, this silly video doesn't explain why there is only a 16 foot hole in the side of the Pentagon and why no engines were found, and why the lawn remained unscathed, and why they confiscated the real videos from the nearby citgo and sheraton.

[/ QUOTE ]





16 foot hole??

[RedBean]

[ QUOTE ]
there is only a 16 foot hole in the side of the Pentagon


[/ QUOTE ]

O RLY?



See that yellow firetruck, it's about 40-50 feet in length. Either way, just a rough guess here, but the affected area of the Pentagon is just a smidge more than 16 feet.

[ QUOTE ]
and why no engines were found

[/ QUOTE ]

Engine wreckage was recovered. So was plane wreckage, wheel wreckage, all sorts of stuff that you would expect to find at the crash site of a 757.

[ QUOTE ]

Keep believing the "official" story.
Don't bother to look at alternative views.

[/ QUOTE ]

I notice you continually skirt the question regarding where you propose flight 77 ended up (and the 60+ passengers) if you really think they didn't impact the pentagon.

Please, can the conspiracy nuts tell me their theory as to what happened to FLight 77 if it didn't hit the pentagon?

[Cumulonimbus]

[ QUOTE ]

16 foot hole??

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure, you would post the post-collapse picture. How about a pre-collapse or two? Notice that the bend in the roof is the spot where it broke and everything to the right of it collapsed, as can be seen in the above picture.




Find the 757!

[CORed]

Gee, I don't know, maybe the blurry photos are all they have. If they were going to produce fake evidence to quell the conspiracy theories, don't you think they'd come up with something better? I'm no fan of the Bush administration, but as far as 9/11 is concerned, I seriously doubt that they are covering up anything but their own incompetence.

If you believe the more wacko conspiracy theories, you have to believe that they not only fired a missile at the Pentagon, but somehow made an airliner plus crew and passengers disappear, and that they flew planes into the world trade center towers and explosively demolished them and wtc 7. What was the purpose of demolishing wtc7 long after the plane crash + demolition of the main towers? Come on folks, this is silly. If you expect me to believe that the collapse of the main towers wasn't a direct result of the planes crashing into the towers and the massive jet fuel fires that followed, show me some evidence. Claims that the plane crash and fire couldn't have caused the collapse are silly. They did cause the collapse, unless you can show me some convincing evidence that something else did. It's almost like you saw somebody pour gasoline inside a house and then light a match, and then say that couldn't have been what made the house burn down, I'm sure a flying saucer shot the house with its death ray.

[CORed]

[ QUOTE ]
Doesn't the date "Sep. 12, 2001" at "17:37" get you wondering that this may not be what actually happened on september 11th?!!!!!!
Furthermore, this silly video doesn't explain why there is only a 16 foot hole in the side of the Pentagon and why no engines were found, and why the lawn remained unscathed, and why they confiscated the real videos from the nearby citgo and sheraton.
Keep believing the "official" story.
Don't bother to look at alternative views.

[/ QUOTE ]

Acutally, it makes me more convinced that it's real. If they were going to fake it, don't you think they'd get the date and time right? I find it much more believable that the clock on the camera was set incorrectly than that somebody put together fake pictures and screwed up the date.

[SheenFan]

The picture you show is the after-effects, when the roof caved-in----not the initial impact!
Also, where is the fire-charred lawn?
Where are the engines?
Where is the black box?

[SheenFan]

Thanks for posting this!!!

[CORed]

I would say that the fact that the web site doctored the pictures shows that they are much more interested in supporting their silly conspiracy theories than finding the truth.