Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 07-21-2005, 02:20 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Crying bloody tears at 20/40
Posts: 4,504
Default Re: Comment on Greenstein Rating

[ QUOTE ]
She could get away with that only in the most loose/passive games, in those games you don't need to read tells, you just need to be able to read hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

My guess is she'd have a tougher time beating those games than the "tougher" ones, only because nobody lays down a pair for anything. Without the option to bluff, her win rate pretty much would be dependent on value-betting, and when she has to play every single one of her hands . . .

I'm not a pro, but I have a hunch that in some ways that'd be a tough game to crack.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.