never bluff a fish?

[Necromancer]

grunch
are two players folding this often enough to make it worth it? Risking 1 bb to win 1.5 in this situation seems crazy to me.

[DrewOnTilt]

Good lord. You win this pot, then so what? It's TINY. Check through and go on to the next hand.

[vinnox]

[ QUOTE ]
CO villain in this hand is a true to life honest to god manna from heaven loose passive unthinking fish.

SB is most likely not sophisticated enough to check and induce a bluff with a pair on that river.

[/ QUOTE ]


So they'll call with K-hi, Q-hi and god knows what else.

[TomBrooks]

[ QUOTE ]
You win this pot, then so what? It's TINY.

[/ QUOTE ]
With the winnings, you would only be able to get one item from the dollar menu.

[Xellos]

The last time I tried this the pot was HU and I got called by Q high. There's no way I'm trying to win a 3 handed pot with nothing in it.

[Redd]

edit: nm, figured it out

[mtdoak]

Not in a pot this small. your risking 1 BB to win 1.5...you have to win 66% of the time. My guess is this is working 20%, espically against 2 players .

[JerseyTom]

Betting here is insanity; it's a tiny, nothing crap-ass pot. Check thru, next hand please...


Tom

[Transference]

[ QUOTE ]
I guess as an academic exercise, if some pro-gambling philanthropist were to be walking by and threw some cash in the pot right when the river card was flipped,

[/ QUOTE ]

awsome