![]() |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
LMAO 99%? Being a bit unreasonable here? [/ QUOTE ] LMAO, don't know [censored] about statistics, here? |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] winnar |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
i call [censored]
|
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Only up to 1/2?
That's right. It's significant. |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
do you use winhold'em or have you written your bot from scratch? [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure 15+ptbb/100 is easily attainable for a good player at 100-200nl. At Party anyway... I've sustained 10ptbb/100 over 70k hands 6-tabling and I suck at poker. [/ QUOTE ] jay, there are a lot of us who still mourn party poker. please don't talk about her like she's still out there. |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would like to test your theory with as many 1-2 tables as you wish HU
|
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Gary, reading apparently isn't your friend...
"I figured out a system of play, after playing 3 million hands of poker and creating about 6 different strategy systems, that yields about 30BB/100 as a winrate at the low stakes levels (25c/50c - $1/2) NL." You failed, nice try though. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|