![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
1. The impression is not blatantly false and there was no misinformation. It is in fact true and something liberals have been saying since before the war. If it turns out that the report did not draw that conclusion, then the report itself is biased and incomplete.
2. If sensitive parts can be redacted, why weren't they before Bush needed this report for political purposes? Freedom abhors secret government. |
|
|