|
|
#51
03-24-2006, 10:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
[ QUOTE ]
The Cleveland Indians already have a first baseman better than Choi in Ben Broussard. [/ QUOTE ] HAHAHAHAHHAAHHA 
|
|
#52
03-24-2006, 10:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
[ QUOTE ]
Choi has supposedly lost bat speed since he put up those monster numbers in the minors, making his comps not quite as effective. [/ QUOTE ] This is due to Dodgers hitting coaches telling Choi to shorten his swing. This will stop in Boston.
|
|
#53
03-24-2006, 10:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
[ QUOTE ]
.349 WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE [/ QUOTE ] Look at his isolated OBP and isolated SLG values. If he can pick up his batting average after dealing with the [censored] hitting coaches over in Atlanta, he will be a very valuable asset.
|
|
#54
03-24-2006, 10:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] .349 WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE [/ QUOTE ] Look at his isolated OBP and isolated SLG values. If he can pick up his batting average after dealing with the [censored] hitting coaches over in Atlanta, he will be a very valuable asset. [/ QUOTE ] Choi as a valuable asset is something I definately do not agree with.
|
|
#56
03-24-2006, 10:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
[ QUOTE ]
please define valuable asset [/ QUOTE ] Better than league-average.
|
|
#57
03-24-2006, 10:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
That's a horrible definition.
|
|
#58
03-24-2006, 10:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hee Seop Choi to the Red Sox, for NOTHING.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] please define valuable asset [/ QUOTE ] Better than league-average. [/ QUOTE ] Awesome.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
