![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
If they look like women, I don't see the problem. How many movies are there with high schoolers that are purposely sexy? Lots and lots (Bring it on, Clueless, etc). Most women are fully physically developed by 14-15 and it's no sin to notice. It'd be a travesty to try and do more than notice though...emotional maturity != physical maturity. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, most of the girls playing those high schoolers are like 23. Most women are definitely not fully developed at 14. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Most women are definitely not fully developed at 14. [/ QUOTE ] very true. But oh man, some of them sure are |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
If there's grass on the field...
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
If there's the oldest and most annoying cliche in the world... [/ QUOTE ] FYP |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If they look like women, I don't see the problem. How many movies are there with high schoolers that are purposely sexy? Lots and lots (Bring it on, Clueless, etc). Most women are fully physically developed by 14-15 and it's no sin to notice. It'd be a travesty to try and do more than notice though...emotional maturity != physical maturity. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, most of the girls playing those high schoolers are like 23. [/ QUOTE ] Depends. In movies with nudity, yes, though in American Beauty the girl was under 18. In non-nude movies, age appropriate is common (Hillary Duff, Amanda Bynes, any number of those types). Brittney Spears was, what 16, when her first video came out and she was considered hot. [ QUOTE ] Most women are definitely not fully developed at 14. [/ QUOTE ] Depends on the person, but you're right. Well on the way though quite often. Many models start in their mid-teens because that's the point where they're curves start to look distincty womanly vs. girlish. Most women reach close to full height, with associated development, in the first year of high school. Guys tend to follow a couple years later and have a longer period of filling out (putting on muscle). I have kids age 15, 14, and 12. The girls my 15 year old hangs out with are distinctly womanly, while those my 12 year old hands out with look like little girls. There's a huge change in physical development between 7th and 9th grade. Anyway, the point being, the OP isn't a pervert if he notices because they have womanly curves. Staring out the window with a bottle of baby oil in hand though...that's pretty perverted. |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If there's the oldest and most annoying cliche in the world... [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] I really hate FYPs, but not as much as I hate that dumba** line. So, thank you. |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Depends on the person, but you're right. Well on the way though quite often. Many models start in their mid-teens because that's the point where they're curves start to look distincty womanly vs. girlish. [/ QUOTE ] Models with "womanly curves"? Really? I think you've got this backward. The reason they start and end careers when they're still teenagers is because for some reason they don't want models to have womanly curves. |
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm going to make a guess that this is happening right now. But the naked part is OP's fantasy/embellishment.
|
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If there's the oldest and most annoying cliche in the world... [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] I really hate FYPs, but not as much as I hate that dumba** line. So, thank you. [/ QUOTE ] I agree, but for some reason I like the follow-on line; if not, flip her over and play in the mud. It's equally retarded but always makes me snicker. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
![]() |
|
|