|
|
#11
01-09-2006, 03:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
52! = FIFTY TWO!
|
|
#12
01-09-2006, 04:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
omg!!!
Where the heck do I say in my post that they are rigged? At best I said that a friend thinks they might be screwed up. Never rigged. Rigged is intentional. Screwed up is unintentional. One more time...for the mentally challenged... I.did.not.say.they.were.rigged.nor.do.I.think.they .are.rigged. Read it slowly.
|
|
#14
01-09-2006, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
My question is how is there RNG used? I know that's pretty general...is there an RNG for each and every table? Or is there one RNG for the whole site? [/ QUOTE ] Dedicated "entropy servers" feed the entire site. They are dedicated solely to generating the entropy needed for all of the tables on the site. Jester
|
|
#15
01-09-2006, 04:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 52! is about 2225. [/ QUOTE ] On what planet did they get this from? Must be a typo in their document. Isn't this around 8e+67 or 8 quadgazillionbillion or so? [/ QUOTE ] I'm taking a wild guess and saying that the number didn't correctly translate when pasted into the 2+2 forums. [/ QUOTE ] Correct. The number on the page is 2^225. On the page, the 225 is in a superscript font, but when you cut and paste into plaintext here, the exponent doesn't come across. Jester
|
|
#16
01-09-2006, 04:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
How come there are more Stars rigged posts than Party? [/ QUOTE ] It's that 2 second delay for the last card.
|
|
#17
01-09-2006, 05:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
Oooooohhhh, so you mean stars is "unintentionally rigged"! Much better. [/ QUOTE ] I don't know what adults did to some of you as children, but I pity you. I really feel bad for you. Also, there is no such thing as "unintentionally rigged." Seriously, why does 2+2 flame more than any forum? It's obvious that I do not think Stars is rigged. "Equal" stop being jealous I took your girlfriend, and move on man. If I woulda known you would pull this type of crap, I would have left her alone. Grow up.
|
|
#18
01-09-2006, 05:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
How come there are more Stars rigged posts than Party? [/ QUOTE ] it is the 7th street LOGarithm. they don't call it riverstars for nuttin'.  btw, you can disable it by typing <font color="red">ayemAmarIItardo </font>in the chatbox. this code IS case sensitive.
|
|
#19
01-09-2006, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Oooooohhhh, so you mean stars is "unintentionally rigged"! Much better. [/ QUOTE ] I don't know what adults did to some of you as children, but I pity you. I really feel bad for you. Also, there is no such thing as "unintentionally rigged." Seriously, why does 2+2 flame more than any forum? It's obvious that I do not think Stars is rigged. "Equal" stop being jealous I took your girlfriend, and move on man. If I woulda known you would pull this type of crap, I would have left her alone. Grow up. [/ QUOTE ] I am officially changing my earlier comment of "YFSSCKT" to "YSSCKY." Good Day.
|
|
#20
01-09-2006, 07:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pokerstars RNG (not a rigged post)
[ QUOTE ]
"Equal" stop being jealous I took your girlfriend, and move on man. If I woulda known you would pull this type of crap, I would have left her alone. Grow up. [/ QUOTE ] Atleast team canada pulled off the victory last week. Those Canucks are gonna get their act together aswell.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
