[epdaws]

BW --

First, 20k hands is a pretty small sample size. If you think that 20k hands is enough to prove a winning player, well, that surprises me.

Second, I was hoping you meant 16 PTBB/100 at NL 25. 6-tabling shouldn't make that much of an impact at that level. I have no doubt you're a winning player, but that just goes to show that your sample size for targeting win-rate and then moving up is muy pequeno.

I would guess that there is all this talk about moving up strategies lately because of Tickner, but it's a little strange to see. I'm not sure there is one correct approach, and I don't know why everyone seems to be searching for the Holy Grail on this.