#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL, bluffing a river block bet
Yeah i follow you, theese things can tilt you so bad
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL, bluffing a river block bet
thats a pretty high wtsd..
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL, bluffing a river block bet
[ QUOTE ]
thats a pretty high wtsd.. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah it is which makes me dislike the bet a lot more. I shouldn't have included it in the post because I didn't look during the hand (should have obv). |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL, bluffing a river block bet
[ QUOTE ]
thats a pretty high wtsd.. [/ QUOTE ] pretty meaningless over 70 hands I bet if you didn't include results in OP, people would not have hated it so much. I don't do this much, but I don't think this is such a bad spot for it... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL, bluffing a river block bet
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] thats a pretty high wtsd.. [/ QUOTE ] pretty meaningless over 70 hands I bet if you didn't include results in OP, people would not have hated it so much. I don't do this much, but I don't think this is such a bad spot for it... [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, WTSD numbers take a lot longer to develop correctly than do things like VPIP. Mostly because most hands don't go to showdown and if they have a few hands that got checked down, say after limping in the SB this number will be artifically high. I don't why I included results, I guess I wanted to say the bluff failed but was my logic wrong. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|