Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Puzzles and Other Games
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: how old are you
<18 7 3.78%
18-20 47 25.41%
21-24 64 34.59%
old as shit 67 36.22%
Voters: 185. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #261  
Old 10-26-2007, 08:47 AM
Zurvan Zurvan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oshawa
Posts: 10,229
Default Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS

Diary Room

Mets

[ QUOTE ]

this sux

i wish val let nich win

looks like val is gonna either put up sig/herbie sig/nez or sig/clown. i hate this idea with a passion

im considering having him put up me/nez and letting clown decide it. gotta know where clown stands. thing is, if i survive then i gotta trust clown more than val right?

sig/herbie i dont know what clown does. sig/nez i dont know what clown does. me/nez for some reason i feel like clown sends nez home.

i dont think ill tell val to do it though. vals in a horrible spot here. he is 5th place in luckays eyes, and thinks hes 5th in mine, but i told him realisticalkly he is probably 3rd or 4th at the moment. but again, if sig loses i cant really partner with val any more. and if herbie loses than luckay cant.

val should have let nich decide. it made the most sense for him

this sux

alex is pretending to be neutral, but wants me dead. wtf. its okay though, i know val wont put me up unless i ask for it. at least im pretty sure.

luckay nez herbie alex
mets hbe nich sig

clown val

game is balance on the surface. who knows though.
the fact that luckay is agreeing for sig to die means that either sig is not aligned with nez, or that luckay doesnt know about it if he is.

val val val val val val val

your killing me here. sig going home is a nail in my coffin and would cause me to reevaluate the entire game. its too early to reevaluate. so this sux


[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

Dear Val:
CC:Zurvan

if sig dies, then youll choose luckays side for sure. you know your last on luckays side, you think you might be second to last on mine -- and you want to kill the guy you think is last. so then you will have no reason to even want to come to me.

your strategy is confusing me.

im really thinking hard about the idea of you putting up me and nez here ,,,,,,,,,, i may ask you to do it cause otherwise sig is doomed which means i am too. and then clown decides the game. but if you think about that, it puts clown in a great position ... so not sure how you feel about that. so its probably lose/lose for both of us.

The correct candidates are Herbie/nez. Well i think luckay is more than herbie and im supposed to talk you out of herbie anyway realistically. but please. it was your first thought. it was the point of keeping me alive.

if sig is dead then team luckay is the majority so i know your there. and if clown is the deciding vote that kills sig, he goes there too and hes prob ahead of you on the hierarchy. so it becomes luckay/nez/herie/alex/clown/you. so you would be 6th place there.

sig dying is awful for you. awful.

nez dying means we work all work together to make sure luckay and herbie go next and then .. 7 left ... jury time. so every move everyone makes is costly. and gives people leverage. and you made it happen. and clown is still alive, so the possibilities are endless.

it really is your best shot to win. ive been closer to you than i have to sig. think about it. stop listening to luckays assinine logic


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #262  
Old 10-26-2007, 09:02 AM
Zurvan Zurvan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oshawa
Posts: 10,229
Default Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS

Diary Room

Nez:

[ QUOTE ]

(8:55:08 AM) nez: Val just PMed me saying he's planning on nominating Clown/Herbie
(8:55:42 AM) nez: Obviously I'm quite pleased that Val won
(8:55:51 AM) nez: My decision not to nominate him last week pays dividends
(8:56:05 AM) nez: But its interesting how everyone is scared of Mets now
(8:56:52 AM) ZurvanCanada: In your ideal world, who would be nominated? Besides the Red Sox?
(8:57:09 AM) nez: Sigh, yes
(8:57:25 AM) nez: In a perfect world he'd be nominating Mets/HBE
(8:57:31 AM) nez: But that's from my perspective
(8:57:42 AM) nez: Where I'm still trying to protect Herb/Clown/Sieg

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #263  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:28 AM
DustinG DustinG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bubbling
Posts: 15,942
Default Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS

i just saw who Val nominated

thats a particularly painful one for me. I guess I need to be rooting for Herbie to survive
Reply With Quote
  #264  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:56 AM
Zurvan Zurvan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oshawa
Posts: 10,229
Default Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS

Thoughts on how hard this challenge will be?

I don't want to make it too hard... but they all seem really easy to me. That may or may not be because I know the originals.

BTW, the answers are below, in white.

<font color="white">
Jonathan Papelbon
George Bush
Bill Gates
Michael Jackson
Tony Soprano / James Gandolfini
anurag dikshit
Dennis Rodman
Jerry Seinfeld
Carrot top
Princess Diana
</font>
Reply With Quote
  #265  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:01 PM
wdcbooks wdcbooks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: [censored] French
Posts: 9,964
Default Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS

There is no way I get numbers one, five or ten. I got the others though without reading your answers.

I have no idea how it is even possible to get one and ten, unless you use photoshop to reconstruct the pictures or something.
Reply With Quote
  #266  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:01 PM
DustinG DustinG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bubbling
Posts: 15,942
Default Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS

there are a couple people on that list I haven't heard of, so I think fairly hard
Reply With Quote
  #267  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:07 PM
DustinG DustinG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bubbling
Posts: 15,942
Default Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS

I hadn't looked at the pictures before I posted here, but after having looked I think this is going to be extremely hard

I think the only ones I would get for sure are Seinfeld, Rodman, and Bush- I guess carrot top as well

I'd probably put Michael Jackson for #4

*edit, lol #4 is Michael Jackson. I suck at reading comprehension
Reply With Quote
  #268  
Old 10-29-2007, 12:10 PM
Zurvan Zurvan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oshawa
Posts: 10,229
Default Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS

I know the Seinfeld one isn't too difficult, but I couldn't stop laughing at his lips when I saw the picture, and then when I did that blur with the coloured dots, I had to keep it. It was too fun to throw away.
Reply With Quote
  #269  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:39 PM
DustinG DustinG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: bubbling
Posts: 15,942
Default Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS

Zurvan,

Ignoring the fact that I've never heard of Jonathon Pappelbom before, how would it be possible for someone to get this?



Lets talk prop-bets. What is the line on no one getting #1?
Reply With Quote
  #270  
Old 10-29-2007, 11:43 PM
CPFB CPFB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: TEXAS, y\'all!
Posts: 3,252
Default Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS

because I know what I'm looking for, I can see "Red Sox." (well, really 2 short words)

he looks like he's holding a burrito or a glass of milk.

haha
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.