Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: You order a mixed drink that costs between $8-12 - you tip?
$1 114 64.41%
$2 58 32.77%
$3+ 5 2.82%
Voters: 177. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #491  
Old 09-28-2007, 08:51 AM
Perplexity Perplexity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 806
Default Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***

OK I just voted on the last 10 polls. Now do mine pls k thx.

RB scoring is standardish. DEF scoring is normal for INT/FR/Sack/TD/etc, but also it's minus one FP per point allowed.
Reply With Quote
  #492  
Old 09-28-2007, 09:39 AM
steviej1717 steviej1717 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Welcome to Air Purify
Posts: 89
Default Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***

Do I start Brady or Romo at QB. ESPN league scoring, also, Packers D or Chargers D.
Reply With Quote
  #493  
Old 09-28-2007, 10:24 AM
Perplexity Perplexity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 806
Default Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***

[ QUOTE ]
Do I start Brady or Romo at QB. ESPN league scoring, also, Packers D or Chargers D.

[/ QUOTE ]

The Bengals gave up 328 yards and FIVE touchdowns to Derek [censored] Anderson. How could you possibly even think about not starting the league-leading (in TDs and rating) QB against them?
Reply With Quote
  #494  
Old 09-28-2007, 10:49 AM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melting Sabrina
Posts: 24,320
Default Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Do I start Brady or Romo at QB. ESPN league scoring, also, Packers D or Chargers D.

[/ QUOTE ]

The Bengals gave up 328 yards and FIVE touchdowns to Derek [censored] Anderson. How could you possibly even think about not starting the league-leading (in TDs and rating) QB against them?

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with you, but Romo is a beast and he's going up against a crappy D. I think it's a valid question, though a better question would be "why haven't you traded Romo/Brady for a stud RB/WR yet?"

Romo has bye first Week 8, but I think you're losing some value waiting that long with someone that good on your bench. Yes, I have a mancrush on Romo.
Reply With Quote
  #495  
Old 09-28-2007, 10:57 AM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melting Sabrina
Posts: 24,320
Default Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***

perplexity. -1FP per point allowed? Seriously? Do you even need to start a Defense? If not, I would never start a D, and if I did, I'd probably draft the Bears, Ravens and Pats with my first 3 picks. NOt really, but that's insane.
Reply With Quote
  #496  
Old 09-28-2007, 11:11 AM
Perplexity Perplexity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 806
Default Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***

[ QUOTE ]
perplexity. -1FP per point allowed? Seriously? Do you even need to start a Defense? If not, I would never start a D, and if I did, I'd probably draft the Bears, Ravens and Pats with my first 3 picks. NOt really, but that's insane.

[/ QUOTE ]

We are required to start a defense. I didn't mention that it's actually -1FP per point allowed, but the defense also gets 20 points just for taking the field. That is, FP = (20 - PA). It can indeed go negative. It is kinda weird, yes.

So far this year, best DST has been Vikings, scoring 45/23/10. Worst has been Giants, scoring -20/-12/7.
Reply With Quote
  #497  
Old 09-28-2007, 11:23 AM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melting Sabrina
Posts: 24,320
Default Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***

Ah ok, that makes a ton more sense. Still pretty high variance.
Reply With Quote
  #498  
Old 09-28-2007, 11:53 AM
666shooter 666shooter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Pasadena, CA
Posts: 137
Default Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***

No PPR.

Four slots in question: WR, WR, WR/RB, QB.

I was going to go with Torry Holt, Wes Welker, and Larry Fitzgerald for consistency but I'm tempted to throw Kevin Jones in at the WR/RB spot. I'm not sold on Bowe or Jennings yet. I'm leaning towards Rivers because of Cutler's ankle and Indy being solid but if Denver falls behind in that game I can see Cutler airing it out quite a bit.

Who would you start in these slots?
Reply With Quote
  #499  
Old 09-28-2007, 12:38 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***

yeah, do you have to start a d? what's the typical score for a D in your league?

edit: oh ok. start packers?
Reply With Quote
  #500  
Old 09-28-2007, 02:29 PM
Victor Victor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,773
Default Re: *** Official Fantasy Football Start\'em/Sit\'em Thread: SEPT ***

bah, fcked up the pole for rb. how bout pick the rb i should bench.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.