Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-01-2007, 02:05 PM
B00T B00T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,011
Default Re: the proof is in the pudding

[ QUOTE ]
I posted a thread earlier about how variance had my ROI 4x what it should've been. WHERES MY LOVE?

[/ QUOTE ]

nobody cares about you, ldo


it's about time Performify takes his turn in what people do best around here
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-01-2007, 02:05 PM
MicroBob MicroBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The cat is back by popular demand.
Posts: 29,344
Default Re: the proof is in the pudding

I went 4 for 4 the opening week of the NFL.

IIRC I think I went 10 for 12 or something ridiculous the opening week of the NCAA-F season.
I posted all those picks on here.

Evidently, I should only be betting in opening weeks.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-01-2007, 02:00 PM
NajdorfDefense NajdorfDefense is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 8,227
Default Re: the proof is in the pudding

Holy crap I've never seen Perf totally clown someone like that in almost 5 years. Where has this talent been hiding?

I didn't get invited to the parade. Where was it again?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-01-2007, 03:12 PM
psuasskicker psuasskicker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: More than meets the eye
Posts: 2,043
Default Re: the proof is in the pudding

Can someone do the math for me on how it could be profitable to lay 3:2 on 60 out of 100 picks? No terms were stipulated, but let's say a normal betting pattern, no passing up slight EV+ to maintain the higher edge. Also assume the tout isn't close to his brag, but that he's an EV0 or EV+ bettor in the 53% win range.

Seems like 3:2 is a lot to lay in such a situation, but I'm frankly too lazy to do the math, but if someone's saying they'll bet $15k on it, I'd at least hope they'd have done some math behind it...

- C -
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-01-2007, 11:22 AM
B00T B00T is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,011
Default Re: the proof is in the pudding

[ QUOTE ]
LOL 15-4, what a square. I believe I'm something like 12-0 on my posts including a 17/2 and a 5/1 winner, but you don't see me creating new topics to announce it. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Seriously though I've been betting online for 3 years now and I keep a log of every bet I've made. Throwing out arbs. I've won a shade over 81% of my bets, so I believe you.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] thanks for Helio mang!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-01-2007, 05:41 PM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wongs are two things, (at least).
Posts: 10,376
Default Re: the proof is in the pudding

I went like 140-36 in teasers. My tout site goes up in 3 days. www.wongmessiah.com . It will be subscription only, and my intense and exhaustive analysis of the lines to find games that cover BOTH the 3 and 7 will be available for $999.95 per season.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-01-2007, 10:25 PM
Mike Cuneo Mike Cuneo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,065
Default Re: the proof is in the pudding

I think it's hilarious that OP thinks "there aren't 100 games to bet" when there are a boatload of bowl games, NFL reg season/playoffs, and also looks like he bets halftime lines.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.