#1
|
|||
|
|||
Math quesion
I'm reading Hilger's Texas Hold'em odds and probabilities and can't get some of the calculations to work out. For example....
The odds of getting dealt Aces twice in a row is 0.0045 x 0.0045 = 0.00002. (all well and good so far). The part I don't get is where he works out the odds by taking the inverse and subtracting 1 giving 49,383 to 1. When I do that calculation I get 49,999. Where am I going wrong? With other calculations it seems to work out fine (i.e. if the probability of something happening is 0.02 then 1/.02 - 1 = 49 to 1) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Math quesion
Odds of getting AA once is 1 in 221
(1/13 for the first card to be an Ace, 3/51 for the second card to be another Ace, 1/13 * 3/51 = 3/663 = 1/221) or 0.0045248868778280542986425339366516 so .0045 is off due to rounding. Odds of getting AA twice is 1 in 221 * 221 = 48841 or .000020474601257140517188427755369464 1 in 49383 and 1 in 49999 are both wrong. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Math quesion
I knew my figure was wrong but I'm trying to do the calculations based on the methods shown in the book. The fact that I can't get the same answer for what should be a fairly simple calculation is a worry.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Math quesion
.0045 x .0045 is actually 0.00002025, that extra little bit you are losing in the rounding to .00002 is the cause of the wrong figure
1 / .00002 = 50000 1 / .00002025 ~= 49383 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Math quesion
Ah, thanks for that. Problem is I was following the example in the book which gave you the rounded up answer of 0.00002 rather than doing the calculation from scratch myself.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Math quesion
I guess you already got your answer, which is good cause I don't know how to do this and I don't feel like thinking about it cause I have a better question:
Who cares? Why do you need to know this? How is this gonna hekp you play poker better? If this is you studying I think you are wasting your time. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Math quesion
A valuable contribution there.....
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Math quesion
[ QUOTE ]
I guess you already got your answer, which is good cause I don't know how to do this and I don't feel like thinking about it cause I have a better question: Who cares? Why do you need to know this? How is this gonna hekp you play poker better? If this is you studying I think you are wasting your time. [/ QUOTE ] Kind of like the amount of time it took you to post this. Nothing wrong with someone trying to understand the math behind probabilities or doing it for the practice. |
|
|