|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Street by street analysis of a marginal hand
I think you played this well PF with the 3-bet and the bet on the flop. However, When these kind of donks shove on top of us here after we've shown this much strength, it is seldomly a draw and he probably has us beat. You are getting a good price to call, but just know that you are very likely to be behind. I would probably fold here.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Street by street analysis of a marginal hand
Not to hijack your thread, but here is a hand I recently played that is a similar situation. Like you, I decided to call.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (4 handed) Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver) Hero ($25) UTG ($24.85) Button ($16.75) SB ($28.25) Preflop: Hero is BB with A, K. UTG raises to $1</font>, Button calls $1, SB calls $0.90, Hero raises to $4</font>, UTG folds, Button calls $3, SB calls $3. Flop: ($13) Q, 8, 2 (3 players)</font> SB checks, Hero bets $8</font>, Button raises to $12.75</font>, SB folds, Hero calls $4.75. Turn: ($38.50) J (2 players)</font> River: ($38.50) 5 (2 players)</font> Final Pot: $38.50 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Street by street analysis of a marginal hand
What am i missing? How are these hands similar?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Street by street analysis of a marginal hand
well OP's was HU. other than that...3 way pot...hero shows strength PF and fl. Donkish villain shoves and we are pretty priced in to call.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Street by street analysis of a marginal hand
*** FLOP *** [8c Qh 9c]
Hero bets $3 Villain raises to $10.45, and is all in Hero has 15 seconds left to act Hero calls $7.45 Villain shows [6s 6h] Hero shows [Tc Td] *** TURN *** [8c Qh 9c] [5s] *** RIVER *** [8c Qh 9c 5s] [4s] Villain shows a pair of Sixes Hero shows a pair of Tens Hero wins the pot ($23.90) with a pair of Tens Villain is sitting out The point of this post was to show that people dont always have monsters. You have to seriously evaluate a villains hand over a wide possible range and not just say that "hes never bluffing with underpairs" or something along those lines. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Street by street analysis of a marginal hand
I really think it's *very tough to just put somebody on a hand like you did, an underpair. I honestly would not expect to be ahead when this is made. While you DO have 60% equity, this all changes when he pushes back at you.
I see this happening mainly with a pair and straight draw, like QJ, or even J9 (it's possible). Vs 9/10 opponents I don't expect to necessarily have the best hand. I think this hand was very results-oriented because I've done some similar plays and "good calls" if you like to call them that, but I just see myself as making a decent call and being lucky... if you were shown QJ or even Q10, I don't think you would be too surprised, since I know shortstacks love to push with top pair alllll the time. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Street by street analysis of a marginal hand
The entire point of this post was to show that this was not a results oriented call. After putting villain on a reasonable pushing range, most of which has me beat, I believe that I have demonstrated decent enough equity to make the call given the pot odds.
|
|
|