Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-12-2007, 12:16 PM
mattnxtc mattnxtc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,649
Default Re: Winning in Tough Hold \'em Games Study Group - Day Two

Thorlief..will do...I think I did it for the first day, but forgot on the second day...I do plan to do a third day, just been swamped at work lately
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-12-2007, 05:19 PM
6471849653 6471849653 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 471
Default Re: Winning in Tough Hold \'em Games Study Group - Day Two

xxxx2 out there is no problem to 33 nor to 22. xxxx3 out there is a problem to 22 but not to the 33. So, it would count that one extra safe card that the 33 has, and that's not nothing as there are only somewhat over 10 different cards on the deck (five on the board).

Some minor thing there is in favor of the 22 (vs. the 33); when the 2 boards the 22 has a strong hand (and the 33 will not fold as easily) but when the 3 (or any higher card) boards (as the bottom card) the 22 is looking weaker.

There seems to be some reversed similarity when comparing big pairs, e.g. AA is a bigger favorite over the KK than KK is a over the QQ. From that point of view, as the AA is so good, one could think that maybe the 22 is comparatively bad.

Just for the wonder of it, at Stars I have after about a 10K of hands at my new limit a very much higher win rate with the KK and QQ at limit holdem than I have with the AA - that rates at the level of the JJ.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.