Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-01-2007, 05:15 PM
riske riske is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 118
Default Re: 200NL - C/R draw on turn?

I'd double barrel this for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-01-2007, 05:33 PM
Paul Thomson Paul Thomson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: donking it up NL200
Posts: 3,589
Default Re: 200NL - C/R draw on turn?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Do you know a lot about standard WTSD%'s? Mine is at 19% and winning% at 53%, I think that's fairly low, but I'm also hyper-aggressive after the flop. I just don't like double-barreling a 52/5 here oop.

[/ QUOTE ]

i made my decision based on hand reading.

[/ QUOTE ]

He wasn't arguing with your logic, he was questioning your assumptions.

How do you get "Villain never has a flush here" when you don't know anything about villain's post-flop play?

[/ QUOTE ]

any big hand raises the flop cause it's obviously so drawy...any suited connector or suite single gap has a big combo draw on the flop, except for possibly KJs which techniclly has the over card.

Therefore, i don't think the Villain has the flush. And even if he calls, we can triple barrel the river and obviously have outs to teh nuts
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-01-2007, 07:35 PM
redCashion redCashion is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bill Fillmaff Protege
Posts: 1,286
Default Re: 200NL - C/R draw on turn?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Do you know a lot about standard WTSD%'s? Mine is at 19% and winning% at 53%, I think that's fairly low, but I'm also hyper-aggressive after the flop. I just don't like double-barreling a 52/5 here oop.

[/ QUOTE ]

i made my decision based on hand reading.

[/ QUOTE ]

He wasn't arguing with your logic, he was questioning your assumptions.

How do you get "Villain never has a flush here" when you don't know anything about villain's post-flop play?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it's safe to say that a flush is a small part of villain's range, only because he is so loose that he clearly doesn't need a flush draw to continue on the flop. I would actually have his fold to cbet % if PaHUD wasn't such a shitter on Vista, but now I have to use Realtime. His agg is 1.

I'd been pretty aggressive on all my tables, and actually had a similar situation of having a flush draw and two overs and c/r ai on the turn on another table. I got ready to do it again here, but ended up C/Cing instead, because I wondered if the C/R as a standard line was semi-spewy.

But the more I thought about the hand after the fact, the more I thought that the only two real options were to lead or to C/R. Leading might be better only because a player like this is not going to bluff raise me ever. And these kinds of players are the ones we should be throwing lots of bets at, especially given looseness combined with semi-sane showdown numbers.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.