Fill up on river, shove or check?

[SABR42]

Jesus Christ some people here have FPS.

Effective stacks sizes are $156, and the pot is $224.

Why would anyone NOT shove here?

The only possible argument for checking is if villain will bluff total air a significant % of the time.

[my1ifesavins]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
CRAI pretty sure its not even close

[/ QUOTE ]

for what reason? villain will never be bluffing and u really think that his v-bet range is wider than his range for calling a shove? if so examples plz.

[/ QUOTE ]

what are you putting villain on after the turn action?

[/ QUOTE ]

umm...a flush ldo? maybe A7/56/44 as far as hands we beat and he's gonna have A8 sometimes i guess. i think his range is super weighted towards flushes tho.

[deaders]

Yah I guess shove is pretty obvious, he folded quickly when I shoved but I think he has to have a big enough hand to call with often enough for shoving to be the best option.

[Rollos]

I would probably c/r since a 45/11 can show up with air here and almost always value bets with a flush.

[orange]

most any hand that he's calling a shove with he's betting on the river.

[goofyballer]

fwiw, hands villain calls a shove with that he might not bet himself = naked Ax, and there's no reason for him to have that

Everything else in his range = let him bet in case he's being a retard and doesn't have trips or better

[Fonkey123]

[ QUOTE ]
fwiw, hands villain calls a shove with that he might not bet himself = naked Ax, and there's no reason for him to have that

Everything else in his range = let him bet in case he's being a retard and doesn't have trips or better

[/ QUOTE ]

They often check behind small flushes and usually check behind 56. They also rarely fold these hands to a push.

[spivey]

A 45/11/2 is never, never ever checking behind a flush.

[terp]

shove

[Keyser.]

[ QUOTE ]
shove

[/ QUOTE ]