No pumpkin pie from Vegas

[1MoreFish4U]

[ QUOTE ]
67% pass completion rate and yet they have the 5th best yards per attempt in the NFL. That should tell you something.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL.

You can't make it any simpler to understand cata-tonia. May as well give up the fight.

Hyro - nothing personal - but you are 1 stubborn sob.

In all sincerity enjoy your Thanksgiving.

Even though I am Canadian I grew up in Windsor and have enjoyed Turkeyball for many years.

I'll be at a neighborhood bar having a few cold ones & playing some QB1.

Favorite call: Kitna QB Sack - Gamebreaker lol.

[kyro]

I'm a stubborn sob because I know I'm right and you're wrong. Also, the pass completion rate is 62.5%. I have no idea where you got 94/141. I guess I should have checked that and not assumed you were presenting me with actual facts. 62.5 is right around average.

Opponents are getting less than 10 yards per completion against the Redskins, good for 9th in the league, and 6.39 yards per attempt, good for 5th in the league. If, after this, you still want to pretend that the Redskins have a poor secondary, then I'm not the stubborn sob who doesn't get "simple" evidence.

BTW, given what stats you've been using, I'm assuming you think the Jets have a better secondary than the Redskins? I mean, they give up fewer yards per game and fewer attempts per game. Obviously this means they have a better secondary than the Skins.

[1MoreFish4U]

Lol. Kyro - I think I see part of your problem. You are so wound up that you don't look at who posts what. None of the 'facts' you present in your last post were even stated by me yet you attribute them all to me.

As a matter of fact, I dont think the Skins or Jets have an especially good secondary, but I havent said that specifically, nor does it matter to MY OPINION - which was that GB does have a good sceondary, and it will be a difference maker in them covering the spread against the Lions.

[kyro]

[ QUOTE ]
Lol. Kyro - I think I see part of your problem. You are so wound up that you don't look at who posts what. None of the 'facts' you present in your last post were even stated by me yet you attribute them all to me.

As a matter of fact, I dont think the Skins or Jets have an especially good secondary, but I havent said that specifically, nor does it matter to MY OPINION - which was that GB does have a good sceondary, and it will be a difference maker in them covering the spread against the Lions.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't really attribute those to you. I'm responding to both of you. You both think Washington has a poor secondary. You're both wrong. You seemed to agree with catatonia on his post so I'm going to lump you both in when I respond.

Also, Washington's secondary is better than GB's secondary. GB's secondary is averagish.

[kyro]

OK, maybe Washington's secondary isn't better than it's running game anymore.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3127928