WTO case vs united states

[Dire]

Sure are some mean folks.

[Spaded]

[ QUOTE ]
Seriously, how do you think that you are going to function in a competitive world with your lame research skills, much less being able to formulate strategy or coherent analysis?

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe my sarcasm detector isn't working, but isn't this the poker legislation forum? Isn't this the place to ask questions about poker legislation? A google search doesn't exactly give you human opinions and insight about specific topics.

[Skallagrim]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Seriously, how do you think that you are going to function in a competitive world with your lame research skills, much less being able to formulate strategy or coherent analysis?

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe my sarcasm detector isn't working, but isn't this the poker legislation forum? Isn't this the place to ask questions about poker legislation? A google search doesn't exactly give you human opinions and insight about specific topics.

[/ QUOTE ]

Many of us who have posted here a long time get tired of answering the same basic questions over and over. The "master sticky" - if read - would answer most of these questions. More importantly, people seeking others to do their research for them should not expect us regular posters to feel like doing it. We are trying to have a reasonable interchange of ideas, not be an internet version of the "answer man" (or, ocassionally, woman).

Also, there is a search function for these forums. I know, it takes like a whole 2 or 4 minutes to figure out how to use it, but a poster not wanting to make that extreme sacrifice of time just dont get much sympathy from me.

And Jay Cohen was kind enough to give the OP all the answer he should need.

Skallagrim