So who is still playing on PP one month later?

fish2plus2 · #1 10-22-2006, 03:38 PM

I feel that the games are much tougher, but still profitable. There are very few short stacks, and most of the players in this game were probably not more than small losers previously. Long term, I would expect a 25-35% decrease in winrate? What do you think? How are the games you are playing in?

raptor517 · #2 10-22-2006, 04:25 PM

everyone else on every other site is still retarded, so it doesnt really matter. party is teh suck anyway [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] sour grapes! holla

fish2plus2 · #3 10-22-2006, 04:29 PM

really? i thought stars game selection looked very bad.

9cao · #4 10-22-2006, 09:46 PM

I am running pretty bad at in the 20 game but the games are way, way worse than they used to be, mainly because you can't practice game selection.

mperich · #5 10-22-2006, 10:58 PM

I still play 25/50, mainly HU and 3 handed only if possible. Games look ok to me, not great but worth playing for sure

-Mike

Unarmed · #6 10-23-2006, 10:26 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I am running pretty bad at in the 20 game but the games are way, way worse than they used to be, mainly because you can't practice game selection.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. 5/10 is waaaaaay worse and close to unplayable (not unplayable I cant make money, but why bother having a variance war with 5 other decent pros unplayable) a good % of the time. IDK you can still make money there, but theres def softer sites.

Kirkrrr · #7 10-23-2006, 10:28 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I am running pretty bad at in the 20 game but the games are way, way worse than they used to be, mainly because you can't practice game selection.

[/ QUOTE ]

Having never bothered with game selection online in the first place, I feel no pain [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

Kirk

pokerprochris · #8 10-23-2006, 12:00 PM

25-50 and 10-20 seems ok, 5-10 is alittle more tougher. $5 rake charge at 25-50 sucks. All in all, moving sites soon!

ahnuld · #9 10-23-2006, 12:25 PM

5-10 is alot easier. Its retarded.

Leptyne · #10 10-23-2006, 12:36 PM

[ QUOTE ]
25-50 and 10-20 seems ok, 5-10 is alittle more tougher. $5 rake charge at 25-50 sucks. All in all, moving sites soon!

[/ QUOTE ]

First I've heard of that. Sounds like they're desparately trying to make up for their loss in volume. As a business man I always wondered why Party made such a poor (IMO) business judgement. Some unseen pressure applied? When I see this in the US I always figure someone has figured a way to make big bucks. Oops, guess this turned into a rant.