#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tableselection for Prima?
cool. your products rock
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tableselection for Prima?
[ QUOTE ]
Unfortunately no news on the automatic table closing. The attempt i had in mind seem to be not working. Got to find another way... [/ QUOTE ] I will purchase once this feature is available. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tableselection for Prima?
Is Ladbrokes likely to be added in the future?
Thanks. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tableselection for Prima?
Unfortunately adding Ladbrokes is not possible.
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tableselection for Prima?
When I purchased the old SpadeEye about a year ago, you had said that new sites were in the works and would be added. But now it seems that for every new site you add, you are requiring the purchase of an entirely new product.
I feel a little ripped off, honestly. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tableselection for Prima?
As you are now using SpadeEye now for almost a year you sure have noticed the constant developement on SpadeEye [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
New sites are always being added, bugs are getting fixed, new feature requests are being fullfilled, and support is being done. Last sites that have been added to SpadeEye are the AbsolutePoker skins (Big Chip and Vegas24) and Bodog. Unfortunately i can not add the bigger networks to SpadeEye. It's no wonder, that no other tableselection tool like PrimaEye (for Prima/Microgaming) or EyePoker (for iPoker) exist. It is pretty much work to develope such a thing and keep support alive. So i had two options: 1) Stay with SpadeEye and take care for the "easy" to add sides or 2) Spent some weeks in developement and expand to other networks. And if you watch the market it is not very unusual to do so. Think of e.g. Idleminer. It looks like every tool does the same, but it's a complete different tool with a different approach. Every pokerroom is different. And if you consider that competitors are selling e.g. datamining utilities, that are less powerfull than EyePoker, for $25. Where EyePoker allows you to datamine and tableselect, then the price is not very high. How much did you pay for your SpadeEye copy one year ago? $30? or less? As you are using it for 1 year i can not believe it did not pay off, or made you life easier? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Tableselection for Prima?
Yes, you make some good points there, Snood.
As far as buying PrimaEye - I'm not sure that I really need the table selection support for Prima considering that there usually aren't a huge # of tables running at any given limit and they are easy for me to scroll through. But datamining there is kind of a pain and I could use the program for that. If you can add automatic table closing based on # of players seated (or even just close and open a new one when a table is shut down), I'll consider purchasing it. Also - I haven't been using SpadeEye too much lately, but was wondering if this is possible and if not can it be added? It would be great to be able to specify a certain # of tables to be opened at each limit that is specified for datamining. For example, lets say I want to datamine both 1/2NL and 2/4NL - I'd like to tell SpadeEye to open 8 tables of each, rather than opening as many as possible at the higher priority limit and then moving to the next limit. |
|
|