1/2: 150bb Deep: Anyone value bet/fold river?

[pureklas]

kaby i think you have a huge leak going broke with TPTK but whatever. I bet 100 he min chk raised I folded.

[Oct0puz]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what hand is calling 95$ that isn't calling 110$? :/

[/ QUOTE ]


You also have to factor in the times we're being trapped.

[/ QUOTE ]

This logic is so flawed. If we think that his calling with a worse hand more often than trapping then why not bet 110 if his calling range is the same.

[carrotsnake]

its not called going broke when you have the nuts

[CptnObvius]

Normally I'm checking behind here as there just feels like nothing I can beat that is worth the call (although I accept that is prolly flawed logic).

In this spot a value bet def looks good as calling station status is established. In saying that, a call from A5/A6/A10s wouldn't surprise me at all in which case you lose more. difficult to even see a calling station calling 100ish here without 2/pr or set. Really need to see what he has been showing down with. Without any other reads I am checking behind.

[ikestoys]

dude, he's not a good player, just bet

[kaby]

[ QUOTE ]
kaby i think you have a huge leak going broke with TPTK but whatever.

[/ QUOTE ]

vs a 40/0/.7 that never showed strenght in the hand? i doubt it

[EasyAs1-2-3]

I don't like the idea of bet/folding like 90 here. I'd want to go w/ a c/c here b/c of pot/stack sizes, but he's so passive - that's not gonna work. I think we can def VB but then arent we then priced in to call his river raise, or is that really spewy despite odds offered to call? FWIW you are 150BBs deep w/ TPTK, you GOTTA bet more on flop and turn

[HiBaCHi]

31, 93, shove

[pureklas]

Easy the trouble with calling his raise is that he is so passive we are never ahead.

[bilbo-san]

[ QUOTE ]
kaby i think you have a huge leak going broke with TPTK but whatever.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is lol.