playing against ratholers

[cockandbull]

mel,

looking at pokerstove, working things out for themsleves, giving ideas to think through a hand much better.

i dont get the question...

[Syntec87]

Hmmm, this thread has inspired me to become a ratholer, looks profitable

[IHateCats]

Not necessarily true at all, a short stacks push range is quite narrow. It's fine to have a light raising range but if so commit fewer chips and don't make loose calls of a ss's push with suited connectors.

[ImsaKidd]

[ QUOTE ]
Hmmm, this thread has inspired me to become a ratholer, looks profitable

[/ QUOTE ]

YEAH GUYS WE NEED ANOTHER IMSAKIDD

MODS

LOCK

OR

DELETE

PLZ

[IHateCats]

Spare us this argument, it's not like it's news that with decent table selection short stacking can be profitable. And there's no shortage of advice out there already on how to do it either.

[Syntec87]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hmmm, this thread has inspired me to become a ratholer, looks profitable

[/ QUOTE ]

YEAH GUYS WE NEED ANOTHER IMSAKIDD

MODS

LOCK

OR

DELETE

PLZ

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont get this, explain?

[jalexand42]

[ QUOTE ]
ehh guys, when u open the button, u should be opening hands that u can call the shove from the short stacker with...

[/ QUOTE ]

Ummm no. Please don't ruin luego's thread.

[IHateCats]

Do you understand why the mistake is not raising light with a ss in the blinds but committing too many chips when you do it?

[Triumph36]

IMSA is trying to derail the thread with stupid garbage. Everyone knows that shortstacking is possibly profitable, but too many of them really cuts into the profit, which is what IMSA's so worried about.

I suggest instead focusing on how to beat players who shortstack. There's been some good advice offered so far.

[NHFunkii]

[ QUOTE ]
Mods this thread offends me plz lock/delete.

it will only make more ppl ss.

[/ QUOTE ]


agreed.